Council MInutes
December 16, 2008
BETHLEHEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING
10 East Church Street – Town Hall
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Tuesday, December 16, 2008 – 7:00 PM
1. INVOCATION
2. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
President Donchez called the meeting to order. Pastor Mario
Corado, Templo El Refugio, offered the invocation which was
followed by the pledge to the flag. Present were Jean Belinski,
Karen Dolan, Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., Gordon B. Mowrer, J. William
Reynolds, J. Michael Schweder, and Robert J. Donchez, 7.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Minutes of December 2, 2008 were approved.
5. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR (for public comment on ordinances
and resolutions to be voted on by Council this evening)
2009 Budget
Robert Pfenning, 2830 Linden Street, complimented the Administration
and Council on the budget hearings that were informative.
Mr. Pfenning thought there was a lack of specific questions
from Council Members about line items in the 2009 Proposed
Budget, and no amendments to reduce the Budget other than
those forwarded by the Administration. Mr. Pfenning concluded
that Council feels the modified Budget submitted by the Administration
contains reasonable estimates of the expenditures needed to
provide the citizens with adequate public services and proper
quality of life. Referring to Councilman Schweder’s
fears of revenue shortfalls, Mr. Pfenning asked if the revenues
are not met why should the citizens not be expected to pay
for the services they receive through a tax increase.
Dana Grubb, 2420 Henderson Place, recalled that last May
Members of Council supported the Mayor’s plan for use
of the casino host fee and asked what happened to that plan
in the 2009 Budget since the revenue is shown but not the
expenditures. Mr. Grubb felt there is no accountability in
the budget for the use of the fees, no measure of performance
in meeting the Mayor’s five year plan, and the community
is being robbed of gauging the casino’s impact on the
budget. Mr. Grubb commented the only thing he has been able
to determine is that $68,000 of the $1.3 million budgeted
will be used for hiring three police officers mid-year. Mr.
Grubb wondered how much of the remaining money will go to
increasing the cash balance to between 5%-15% of the operating
budget, or paying down debt, or reducing the City’s
reliance on water and sewer revenue to cover operating expenses.
Mr. Grubb thought that Council is falling short on holding
the Administration accountable for the expenditures on which
the casino host fee can be used. Mr. Grubb asked how Council
will measure achieving those goals. Mr. Grubb complimented
the Administration for the budget adjustments submitted to
Council, and said he was disappointed that Council did not
come up with their own recommendations. Mr. Grubb pointed
out that across the board cuts are not unusual for City Council,
and it gives the Administration the courtesy and flexibility
to determine where cuts should be made since the Administration
knows better where day to day cuts can be made. Remarking
that if Council does not exercise its power of the purse it
does not mean anything, Mr. Grubb thought it is incumbent
on Council to weigh in on the budget. Mr. Grubb observed that
the entire country is suffering through the lean economic
times, and he thought Council could have done a better job.
Eddie Rodriquez, 1845 Linden Street, expressed that he agrees
with the recycling program but disapproves of the yard waste.
Mr. Rodriquez thought the security cameras are a very good
thing and aids in the area of prevention, and added that he
did a Spanish version for Channel 69 news on the issue. Mr.
Rodriquez, stating the Police are doing a good job, urged
the Police to continue to address various matters.
Bill Scheirer, 1890 Eaton Avenue, thought that Old Business
and Communications were included as Agenda items on which
the public can speak under the first Courtesy of the Floor.
Christopher Spadoni, City Council Solicitor, advised he
would look into the matter and report back to Council.
6. OLD BUSINESS.
A. Tabled Items
None.
B. Unfinished Business
1. Establishing Article 314 – Security Cameras
2. Political Contributions and Expenditures – Proposed
Ordinance
3. Gift of Real Estate – LVIP
4. Recreation Fees – Proposed Increases
5. Bill No. 28 - 2008 – Amending Zoning Ordinance –
Various Sections
C. Old Business – Members of Council
None.
7. COMMUNICATIONS
A. City Solicitor – Easement Agreement – Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation – Route 412
The Clerk read a memorandum dated December 11, 2008 from
John F. Spirk, Jr., Esq., City Solicitor, to which was attached
a proposed Resolution and Easement Agreement with the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation to grant and
convey approximately 0.090 acres of land as a slope easement
associated with the removal of the stone arch bridge along
State Route 412. Also attached was a letter from the Department
of Transportation dated December 10, 2008 requesting that
Council act on this matter this evening so that the bid opening
for the project can occur early enough in 2009 to accommodate
the goal of removing the bridge during the Easter holiday
weekend which is critical to meeting the schedule for the
highway improvements that will be constructed by the Las Vegas
Sands.
President Donchez stated that Resolution 11 C is listed
on the Agenda.
B. Director of Planning and Zoning – Comprehensive
Plan Final Draft
The Clerk read a memorandum dated December 8, 2008 from Darlene
Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, stating that on November
6 the Planning Commission held a public meeting to gather
input on the Draft City of Bethlehem Comprehensive Plan dated
August 2008. On November 13 the Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend approval of the Plan with eight revisions
that were attached as a "Summary of Recommended Revisions
to the Draft Comprehensive Plan". The draft plan was
sent to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission, all abutting
municipalities and the school district to provide the opportunity
to comment, and the comment letters were attached.
Mr. Reynolds, recalling that at the October 21, 2008 City
Council Meeting Bill No. 28 – 2008 that amended various
sections of the Zoning Ordinance was tabled, asked whether
those changes are included in the Comprehensive Plan final
draft.
Tony Hanna, Director of Community and Economic Development,
replied no. Mr. Hanna advised the Comprehensive Plan that
has been presented to City Council and the Planning Commission
is precedent to changes in the Zoning Ordinance. The various
changes to the Zoning Ordinance proposed in Bill No. 28 would
be part of the rewrite of the Zoning Ordinance that is currently
underway. Mr. Hanna further informed Mr. Reynolds that the
Zoning Ordinance revisions may be completed in about six to
nine months.
President Donchez stated that a Public Hearing on the Comprehensive
Plan Final Draft will be scheduled at a later date.
8. REPORTS
A. President of Council
None.
B. Mayor
None.
C. Public Works Committee
Chairwoman Dolan presented an oral report of the meeting
held on Tuesday, December 9, 2008 on the following subject:
Amending Article 923 – Disposal and Discharge of Industrial
Waste Regulations. The Committee recommended that Council
approve the Ordinance.
D. Parks and Public Property Committee
Chairwoman Belinski presented an oral report of the meeting
held this evening, December 16, 2008 prior to the City Council
Meeting to review 15 subjects. The Committee tabled a request
to extend the hours of the Golf Course Restaurant beyond 10:00
p.m., and requested further information regarding changes
in the rental amount of the lease provisions.
9. ORDINANCES FOR FINAL PASSAGE
A. Bill No. 31 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 General
Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 31 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
General Fund Budget, on Final Reading.
Amendment to Bill No. 31 – 2008
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored the following Amendment:
That the following sections which read as follows:
SECTION 2. Appropriations in the sum of Sixty-Five Million,
Nine Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand ($65,924,000) Dollars are
hereby made from the General Fund as follows:
To the Council:
Personal Services $ 188,027
Materials and Supplies 1,240
Purchase of Services 82,445
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 271,712
To the Mayor:
Personal Services $ 171,461
Materials and Supplies 2,800
Purchase of Services 5,535
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 179,796
To the Controller:
Personal Services $ 163,717
Materials and Supplies 750
Purchase of Services 5,500
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 169,967
To the Treasurer:
Personal Services $ 1,000
Materials and Supplies 0
Purchase of Services 0
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 1,000
To the Bureau of Law:
Personal Services $ 241,513
Materials and Supplies 0
Purchase of Services 6,000
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 247,513
To the Department of Administration:
Personal Services $1,875,639
Materials and Supplies 102,675
Purchase of Services 319,905
Equipment 76,600
TOTAL $2,374,819
To the Department of Community and Economic Development:
Personal Services $3,733,952
Materials and Supplies 196,259
Purchase of Services 2,100,765
Equipment 43,600
TOTAL $6,074,576
To the Department of Parks and Public Property:
Personal Services $2,554,001
Materials and Supplies 192,900
Purchase of Services 1,096,675
Equipment 4,000
TOTAL $3,847,576
To the Department of Public Works:
Personal Services $3,231,325
Materials and Supplies 366,600
Purchase of Services 2,254,091
Equipment 22,221
TOTAL $5,874,237
To the Department of Police:
Personal Services $11,098,285
Materials and Supplies 572,013
Purchase of Services 308,582
Equipment 32,100
TOTAL $12,010,980
To the Department of Fire:
Personal Services $8,904,171
Materials and Supplies 380,740
Purchase of Services 189,395
Equipment 45,200
TOTAL $9,519,506
To General and Civic Expenses:
Office Supplies, Postage, Equipment Maintenance,
Communications, and Continuous Improvement $ 292,000
Insurance, Social Security, Unemployment Comp.,
Workers Comp., Pensions, Accumulated Sick Leave,
Heart and Lung Act, Trust Payments, Defined
Contribution Plan Match $16,001,013
Landfill Transfer $ 879,042
Refunds and Prior Year’s Encumbrances $ 83,500
Unforeseen Contingencies, Professional Services Expenses
$ 193,732
Memorial Day Decorations, Fourth of July Celebration,
Halloween Parade, Music Fund $ 69,030
U.S. Conference of Mayors $ 5,440
Sister City, PA League of Cities Dues, Fine Arts
Commission $ 33,950
Library $1,194,000
Debt Service $6,600,611
TOTAL $25,352,318
Shall be amended to read as follows:
SECTION 2. Appropriations in the sum of Sixty-Four Million,
Nine Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand ($64,994,000) Dollars are
hereby made from the General Fund as follows:
To the Council:
Personal Services $ 188,027
Materials and Supplies 240
Purchase of Services 78,445
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 266,712
To the Mayor:
Personal Services $ 171,461
Materials and Supplies 2,100
Purchase of Services 5,535
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 179,796
To the Controller:
Personal Services $ 163,717
Materials and Supplies 750
Purchase of Services 5,500
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 169,967
To the Treasurer:
Personal Services $ 1,000
Materials and Supplies 0
Purchase of Services 0
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 1,000
To the Bureau of Law:
Personal Services $ 244,029
Materials and Supplies 0
Purchase of Services 6,000
Equipment 0
TOTAL $ 250,029
To the Department of Administration:
Personal Services $1,826,097
Materials and Supplies 99,475
Purchase of Services 313,155
Equipment 71,600
TOTAL $2,310,327
To the Department of Community and Economic Development:
Personal Services $3,663,315
Materials and Supplies 138,289
Purchase of Services 1,902,365
Equipment 4,600
TOTAL $5,708,569
To the Department of Parks and Public Property:
Personal Services $2,554,001
Materials and Supplies 175,695
Purchase of Services 1,069,175
Equipment 4,000
TOTAL $3,792,871
To the Department of Public Works:
Personal Services $3,202,935
Materials and Supplies 320,770
Purchase of Services 2,218,091
Equipment 22,221
TOTAL $5,764,017
To the Department of Police:
Personal Services $10,985,831
Materials and Supplies 483,025
Purchase of Services 308,582
Equipment 32,100
TOTAL $11,809,538
To the Department of Fire:
Personal Services $8,904,171
Materials and Supplies 320,790
Purchase of Services 189,395
Equipment 45,200
TOTAL $9,459,556
To General and Civic Expenses:
Office Supplies, Postage, Equipment Maintenance,
Communications, and Continuous Improvement $ 277,000
Insurance, Social Security, Unemployment Comp.,
Workers Comp., Pensions, Accumulated Sick Leave,
Heart and Lung Act, Trust Payments, Defined
Contribution Plan Match $15,966,013
Landfill Transfer $ 879,042
Refunds and Prior Year’s Encumbrances $ 83,500
Unforeseen Contingencies, Professional Services Expenses
$ 173,732
Memorial Day Decorations, Fourth of July Celebration,
Halloween Parade, Music Fund $ 69,030
U.S. Conference of Mayors $ 5,440
Sister City, PA League of Cities Dues, Fine Arts
Commission $ 33,950
Library $1,194,000
Debt Service $6,600,611
TOTAL $25,282,318
Voting AYE on the Amendment to Bill 31 - 2008: Ms. Dolan,
Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr.
Donchez, 6. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, 1. The Amendment passed.
Mr. Schweder, stating he did not believe he can legally
vote for the Budget since State law requires that all Budgets
be balanced, asserted there is no way the Budget is balanced.
Mr. Schweder said the revenues will not support the amount
of spending in the Budget. Mr. Schweder recounted that at
the Final Budget Meeting he had explained that the revenue
estimates in the last three to four Budgets had fallen multi-million
dollars short of what was proposed for those budgets and as
of December 5 the Budget was $8.5 million under projected
revenue for the current fiscal year. Mr. Schweder continued
on to recall he had said that if every cent came in the Budget
would still probably come up short. Mr. Schweder noted that
Mr. Leeson, Chairman of the Finance Committee, related that
the City Controller pointed out there was a multi-million
dollar deficit that was being carried over. Mr. Schweder thought
that Members of Council looking at the Budget realistically
would understand that revenues are not going to increase in
2009 over the figures of 2008. Continuing on to say businesses
do not believe that in terms of their revenues, Mr. Schweder
pointed out that evidence, such as in the headline of USA
Today, shows over 95% of people in the country are worried
about the financial conditions. Mr. Schweder denoted that
a local company, Air Products, was the latest to announce
layoffs today. Mr. Schweder stated that, regardless of the
merits of what the revenues are being spent on, the revenues
in no way can reach the point to balance the Budget. Mr. Schweder
said it is for that reason he is going to oppose the Bill
because he thought Council has a legal requirement to do so.
Pointing out several other matters he thought Council should
be very concerned about, Mr. Schweder stressed the debt service
in the Budget is $6.6 million versus $2.7 million in 2004,
and has increased by $3,900,000 since 2004. Mr. Schweder continued
on to observe other things that have gone on in that period
of time such as of October 31 the City has lost $25-$30 million
of the value of its pension investments and denoted that November
was even a worse month so that number will be exceeded. Mr.
Schweder recounted that four years ago the bond salesman told
Council that money should be borrowed to take care of the
shortfall in pension benefits and that an increase of only
7%-10% a year for the next 10-15 years would be needed. However,
Mr. Schweder highlighted the fact that the investment returns
are down probably 35% and making a 29% return over the next
several years is never going to happen. Mr. Schweder asserted
that fiscal mistake after fiscal mistake has been made and
the City has not owned up to what is a legitimate Budget over
this period of time. Observing that past Budgets have come
in with deficits and this one will do the same, Mr. Schweder
stressed no one can dispute that based on the facts and the
numbers over the last three years since the numbers have been
wrong and understated. Mr. Schweder thought it was improper
for Council to vote for something that is not balanced and
a conflict with the oath of office.
Mr. Reynolds asked what the Administration projected the
year end figures would be.
Dennis Reichard, Business Administrator, responded he did
not think the City would end 2008 with a deficit.
Mr. Reynolds, noting he will be supporting the Bill, said
after sitting through the Budget Hearings, looking at the
cuts proposed by the Administration, and talking to Department
Heads about the cuts, he thought the ability to deliver some
of the basic City services was being cut. Mr. Reynolds, while
expressing that everyone hopes the economy will turn around
in 2009, communicated he would not be comfortable voting to
lay off people. Mr. Reynolds said when he looks at the services
the City is obligated to deliver and what Council’s
job is he feels as if there is nothing else to cut in the
Budget. Mr. Reynolds communicated that after the Administration’s
cutting back on the revenue projections he is comfortable
with where the City is going financially in 2009. In looking
at the City’s financial picture in general and acknowledging
that the 2009 economy nationwide might not be as rosy as one
would like, Mr. Reynolds stated the City’s financial
picture has improved in the last several years. He continued
on to say real estate values have continued to rise, debt
is being paid down faster, and financial decisions were made
in the past over which one does not have control currently.
Mr. Reynolds thought that, as far as what can be controlled,
the City’s financial picture is improving and the City
is moving in the right direction that is reflected in the
General Fund Budget. Mr. Reynolds said he will be voting yes
on the Bill.
Ms. Dolan, denoting she has heard Mr. Schweder say he does
not believe in the numbers and the numbers do not speak to
the truth, thought Mr. Schweder probably always lacked faith
in this Administration. Ms. Dolan observed that, in spite
of Mr. Schweder’s comments, the City has had excellent
audits, and the 2007 Audit came out perfectly clean. Ms. Dolan
highlighted the fact that as of last week the City has yet
to borrow money from the Treasurer’s Escrow Account.
Pointing out that revenues and expenses in the 2009 Budget
have been cut, Ms. Dolan thought that to cut them further
would be reckless. Communicating she does have faith in the
Administration and believes they are telling the truth, Ms.
Dolan reiterated that the Audits are good, and she sees no
reason why she should not have faith in the Administration
another year.
Mrs. Belinski, pointing out she has been on the Finance
Committee for 13 years, said at one of the recent Finance
Committee meetings Mr. Leeson asked about the projections
to the end of the year, and in addition the estimate of the
2009 year end projection would have been almost $3.36 million.
Mrs. Belinski continued on to point out $2 million is going
to be taken from the $4 million Stakeholders Agreement as
a one time revenue source as a result of the new development
proposed at Easton Avenue and Route 33, and questioned what
is going to come from the Treasurer’s Escrow Account
to see the City through the end of the year. Mrs. Belinski
recalled the year before $2 million was taken from the Treasurer’s
Escrow Account. While acknowledging the Administration did
make cuts, Mrs. Belinski pointed out it is still a 1.7% increase
over last year’s Budget. Mrs. Belinski questioned how
does the City end the year with a $3.6 million deficit, and
asserted the City is borrowing next year’s property
tax to pay off the debt for this year, and there is no increase
in taxes. Mrs. Belinski said she cannot vote for the Bill.
Mr. Schweder communicated it is naïve to not understand
the basics of audits in that it has nothing to do with the
bottom line but rather the appropriateness of expenditures.
Mr. Schweder observed that most of the taxpayers in the City
do not have guaranteed jobs, and do not spend their lives
in the public sector. Mr. Schweder pointed out that many people
have suffered layoffs and it will continue. Mr. Schweder stressed
the notion that in the public sector anyone has a lifetime
guarantee of a job is an absurdity, or guaranteed benefits
for life, and retirement benefits. Mr. Schweder highlighted
the fact that if there is a budget with 84% or 88% in personnel
costs the only way cuts can be made is probably through layoffs
or abolishing jobs. Communicating he is not suggesting that
necessarily is what needs to be done, Mr. Schweder commented
it probably does. Mr. Schweder said that is why he offered
an amendment not to specifically suggest certain cuts but
to go after the budget figures because he would ask anyone
at the table to debate or dispute the figures that come from
the Budget books over the last three years.
Mr. Reynolds stated he did not refer to the Audit. Mr. Reynolds,
noting he was in the audience for the last several Budget
reviews, said he has heard discussions about the idea that
the finances are not necessarily accurate. Mr. Reynolds expressed
he may have been more likely to vote with Mr. Schweder’s
amendment to reduce the Budget by $1,070,000 if he would have
seen what were the specific cuts. Mr. Reynolds, explaining
he is not saying that someone who has a public sector job
will have it for life, said he is not hearing any proposed
layoffs and is not seeing any place in the Budget were such
a cut could be made. Mr. Reynolds pointed out it was decided
not to add positions in the Budget that were needed because
financially the City was unable to do so. Mr. Reynolds, stressing
he is not naïve about what is being voted on tonight,
said he joins with Council Member Dolan in the belief that
people are living in a City that has succeeded, and although
the City is not perfect it is moving in the right direction.
Mr. Reynolds stated he is ready to vote on the Budget.
Mr. Mowrer said he will vote for the Budget and is basically
satisfied with the process. Mr. Mowrer stated the Administration
has responded by taking things out of the Budget and rechecking
the revenues. Mr. Mowrer, pointing out he has sat through
a lot of budgets, commented he thinks the City has done as
well as possible, and added he will continue to watch the
Budget.
Ms. Dolan, stating she knows the difference between an audit
and a budget, noted that audits are designed in part to catch
illegalities such as hiding or shifting of funds. Denoting
that Mr. Schweder is saying what is being done tonight is
against the law, Ms. Dolan said she does not think that is
the case. Ms. Dolan recounted she had said at the past Budget
meeting that some colleagues thought it was appropriate to
slash $1 million from the Budget and yet no one was talking
about increasing the taxes. Ms. Dolan pointed out the Administration
had worked with Council to come up with Budget cuts, and she
felt it was wise for Department Heads to make the decisions
regarding the various specific cuts. Relating that while Mr.
Schweder was speaking about Budget numbers the Mayor and Mr.
Reichard were shaking their heads, Ms. Dolan stressed they
know much more about their cuts and revenue projections and
said she would like to hear from them.
Mayor Callahan, acknowledging it has been a long budget
process and that a one statement summary would not do the
effort justice, stated the Administration stands behinds the
numbers in the Budget. Mayor Callahan stated that important
adjustments were made given the deterioration of the regional
economy, the City, and around the world. Mayor Callahan advised
that last year’s Audit from an unbiased professional
organization had no material findings. Mayor Callahan enumerated
the General Fund balances as per the 2007 Audit, as follows:
2005 - $10,927; 2006 - $344,690; and 2007 - $1,371,082.
Mr. Schweder explained the point he made is not the balance
in the funds but rather what was projected as revenue and
what came in. Mr. Schweder said that is the deficit. Mr. Schweder
restated the figures are from the official documents of the
Administration. Mr. Schweder denoted that Council was told
there would be $64,000,000 of revenue in 2008 and as of December
5 the revenue was $54,000,000.
President Donchez stated he will support the General Fund
Budget and the amendment. President Donchez thought the Members
of Council would have offered many more amendments if the
Administration had not come in with the $930,000 of reductions.
President Donchez, agreeing that 2009 will probably be a very
difficult year and there may not be a turnaround until 2010,
thought the cuts were a responsible thing to do and it was
difficult for the Department Heads. President Donchez thought
revenues have to monitored extremely closely, month by month
and quarterly, and Council needs to be provided with the expenses.
President Donchez noted that the pension bond to which Mr.
Schweder referred is a concern, and the decline in investments
as has been seen in other states. Reiterating he will support
the General Fund Budget, President Donchez said the cuts were
responsible and Members of Council would usually offer many
cuts such as in overtime and temporary help but those cuts
were proposed by the Administration with the support of Council.
Voting AYE on Bill No. 31 – 2008, as amended: Ms.
Dolan, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. Donchez,
5. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2. Bill No.
31 – 2008,
hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-31, was declared adopted.
B. Bill No. 32 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Water
Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 32 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Water Fund Budget, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 32 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-32,
was declared adopted.
C. Bill No. 33 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Sewer
Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 33 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Sewer Fund Budget, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 33 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-33
was declared adopted.
D. Bill No. 34 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Golf
Course Enterprise Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 34 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Golf Course Enterprise Fund Budget, on Final Reading.
Amendment to Bill No. 34 – 2008
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored the following amendment:
That Section 1 which reads as follows:
SECTION 1. Appropriations in the sum of One Million, Six
Hundred Two Thousand ($1,602,000) Dollars are hereby made
from the Golf Course Enterprise Fund as follows:
Golf Course Enterprise Fund:
Personal Services $ 682,246
Materials and Supplies 185,850
Purchase of Services 703,904
Equipment 30,000
TOTAL $1,602,000
Shall be amended to read as follows:
SECTION 1. Appropriations in the sum of One Million, Five
Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand ($1,522,000) Dollars are hereby
made from the Golf Course Enterprise Fund as follows:
Golf Course Enterprise Fund:
Personal Services $ 680,246
Materials and Supplies 162,350
Purchase of Services 673,404
Equipment 6,000
TOTAL $1,522,000
Voting AYE on the Amendment to Bill No. 34 - 2008: Ms. Dolan,
Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 5.
Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, 1. The Amendment passed.
Voting AYE on Bill No. 34 – 2008, as amended: Ms.
Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. Donchez, 4. Voting
NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2. Bill No. 34 –
2008, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 2008-34, was declared
adopted.
E. Bill No. 35 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Liquid
Fuels Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 35 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Liquid Fuels, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 35 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-35
was declared adopted.
F. Bill No. 36 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Capital
Budget for Non-Utilities
The Clerk read Bill No. 36 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Capital Budget for Non-Utilities, on Final Reading.
Amendment to Bill No. 36 – 2008
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored the following Amendment:
That the following sections which read as follows:
SECTION 2. Appropriations in the sum of Sixteen Million,
Eight Hundred Twenty-Eight Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Four
Thousand ($16,828,194) Dollars are hereby made from the sources
indicated in Section 3 hereof as follows:
Parks and Public Property
Bethlehem Golf Club 732,000
City Center Improvements 196,900
DAR Memorial House Renovations 10,000
Facility Capital Improvement Plan 694,133
Fire House Repairs 86,000
General Pool Improvements 200,000
Mechanical System Upgrade 200,000
Monocacy/Saucon Cr Erosion Con/Gabions 207,225
Municipal Ice Rink 81,382
Park/Playground Improvements 268,000
Roof, Safety Fire Code 90,000
Sand Island Improvements 634,770
Skate Park 278,369
South Bethlehem Greenway Phase 1 1,350,000
Southside Recreation Programs 24,500
Stone Wall Renovations 100,000
Vehicle/Equipment Replacement 311,500
Total Parks & Public Property 5,464,779
TOTAL NON-UTILITY CAPITAL $16,828,194
(Net Other Funds)
Section 3. The expenditures listed in Section 2 hereof shall
be made from the following sources:
2009 Bond $ 7,593,900
2007 Bond 3,295,415
2005 Bond 27,659
Federal & PA Grants 3,621,025
County Grants 416,293
Cash/Misc. 1,873,902
TOTAL $16,828,194
Shall be amended to read as follows:
SECTION 2. Appropriations in the sum of Sixteen Million,
Nine Hundred Twenty-Eight Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Four
Thousand ($16,928,194) Dollars are hereby made from the sources
indicated in Section 3 hereof as follows:
Parks and Public Property
Bethlehem Golf Club 432,000
City Center Improvements 196,900
DAR Memorial House Renovations 10,000
Facility Capital Improvement Plan 694,133
Fire House Repairs 86,000
General Pool Improvements 200,000
Mechanical System Upgrade 200,000
Monocacy/Saucon Cr Erosion Con/Gabions 207,225
Municipal Ice Rink 81,382
Park/Playground Improvements 268,000
Roof, Safety Fire Code 90,000
Sand Island Improvements 634,770
Skate Park 478,369
Southside Recreation Programs 24,500
Stone Wall Renovations 100,000
Vehicle/Equipment Replacement 311,500
Total Parks & Public Property 5,564,779
TOTAL NON-UTILITY CAPITAL $16,928,194
(Net Other Funds)
Section 3. The expenditures listed in Section 2 hereof shall
be made from the following sources:
2009 Bond $ 7,293,900
2007 Bond 3,295,415
2005 Bond 27,659
Federal & PA Grants 4,021,025
County Grants 416,293
Cash/Misc. 1,873,902
TOTAL $16,928,194
Voting AYE on the Amendment to Bill No. 36 – 2008:
Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr.
Donchez, 5. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, 1. The Amendment passed.
Voting AYE on Bill No. 36 – 2008, as amended: Ms.
Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. Donchez, 4. Voting
NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2. Bill No. 36 –
2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-36, was declared adopted.
G. Bill No. 37 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Capital
Budget for Water Utilities
The Clerk read Bill No. 37 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Capital Budget for Water Utilities, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 37 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-37,
was declared adopted.
H. Bill No. 38 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Capital
Budget for Sewer Utilities
The Clerk read Bill No. 38 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Capital Budget for Sewer Utilities, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 38 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-38,
was declared adopted.
I. Bill No. 39 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 Community
Development Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 39 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
Community Development Budget, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, and Mr.
Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, and Mr. Schweder, 2.
Bill No. 39 – 2008, hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-39,
was declared adopted.
J. Bill No. 40 – 2008 – Adopting the 2009 9-1-1
Fund Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 40 – 2008, Adopting the 2009
9-1-1 Fund Budget, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. Bill No. 40 – 2008,
hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-40, was declared adopted.
K. Bill No. 41 – 2008 – Fixing the 2009 Tax Rate
for All City Purposes
The Clerk read Bill No. 41 – 2008, Fixing the 2009
Tax Rate for All City Purposes, on Final Reading.
Amendment to Bill No. 41 - 2008
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored the following amendment:
That the following sections which read as follows:
SECTION 1. That a tax be paid and the same is hereby levied
on all persons and real property within the said City subject
to taxation for City purposes for the fiscal year, as follows:
Tax for the year 2009 for General City purposes, the sum
of seven and
one tenth (7.10) mills on each dollar of assessed valuation
[or the sum of
seventy-one (71.00) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed
valuation];
For Recreation purposes, the sum of eighty-nine hundredths
(.89) mills
on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of eight
and nine tenths
(8.90) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Debt purposes, the sum of four and thirty-six hundredths
(4.36)
mills on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of
forty-three and six
tenths (43.60) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed
valuation];
For Landfill Debt purposes, the sum of four tenths (.40)
mills on
each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of four (4.0)
cents on each
one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Hirko Settlement Debt purposes, the sum of five tenths
(.50)
mills on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of
five (5.0) cents
on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Library purposes, the sum of eighty-five hundredths
(.85) mills on
each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of eight and
five tenths
(8.5) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation]
to wit:
Mills on Each Cents on Each One
Dollar of Hundred Dollars of
Purpose Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation
General 7.10 71.00
Recreation Levy .89 8.90
Debt 4.36 43.60
Landfill Debt .40 4.00
Hirko Settlement Debt .50 5.00
Library .85 8.50
Total - All Purposes 14.10 141.00
Shall be amended to read as follows:
SECTION 1. That a tax be paid and the same is hereby levied
on all persons and real property within the said City subject
to taxation for City purposes for the fiscal year, as follows:
Tax for the year 2009 for General City purposes, the sum
of seven and
five hundredths (7.05) mills on each dollar of assessed valuation
[or the sum of
seventy and five tenths (70.50) cents on each one hundred
dollars of assessed valuation];
For Recreation purposes, the sum of eighty-eight hundredths
(.88) mills
on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of eight
and eight tenths
(8.80) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Debt purposes, the sum of four and forty-one hundredths
(4.41)
mills on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of
forty-four and one
tenth (44.10) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed
valuation];
For Landfill Debt purposes, the sum of four tenths (.40)
mills on
each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of four (4.0)
cents on each
one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Hirko Settlement Debt purposes, the sum of five tenths
(.50)
mills on each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of
five (5.0) cents
on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation];
For Library purposes, the sum of eighty-six hundredths (.86)
mills on
each dollar of assessed valuation [or the sum of eight and
six tenths
(8.60) cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation]
to wit:
Mills on Each Cents on Each One
Dollar of Hundred Dollars of
Purpose Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation
General 7.05 70.50
Recreation Levy .88 8.80
Debt 4.41 44.10
Landfill Debt .40 4.00
Hirko Settlement Debt .50 5.00
Library .86 8.60
Total - All Purposes 14.10 141.00
Mr. Schweder inquired if the Bill puts in sync the changes
made in the reductions in the General Fund. Mr. Reichard responded
yes.
Voting AYE on the Amendment to Bill No. 41 - 2008: Ms. Dolan,
Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 5.
Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, 1. The Amendment passed.
Voting AYE on Bill No. 41, as amended: Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer,
Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. Donchez, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski,
and Mr. Schweder, 2. Bill No. 41 – 2008, hereafter known
as Ordinance 2008-41, was declared adopted.
L. Bill No. 43 – 2008 – Amending Article 342
– Continuing LERTA through December 2010
The Clerk read Bill No. 43 – 2008, Amending Article
342 – Continuing LERTA through December 2010, on Final
Reading.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. Bill No. 43 – 2008,
hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-42 was declared adopted.
M. Bill No. 44 – 2008 – Amending Article 933
– Recycling
The Clerk read Bill No. 44 – 2008, Amending Article
933 – Recycling, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. Bill No. 44 – 2008,
hereafter known as Ordinance 2008-43, was declared adopted.
Ms. Dolan requested that the City Clerk forward a copy of
the strike-through version of the Ordinance to the EAC so
they can review it, and next year it can be seen how the program
has worked.
10. NEW ORDINANCES
A. Bill No. 45 – 2008 – Amending Article 923 –
Disposal and Discharge of Industrial Waste Regulations
The Clerk read Bill No. 45 – 2008, Amending Article
923 – Disposal and Discharge of Industrial Waste, sponsored
by Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM,
COUNTIES OF LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON,
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMENDING
ARTICLE 923 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES
ENTITLED DISPOSAL AND DISCHARGE OF
INDUSTRIAL WASTE REGULATIONS.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. Bill No. 45 – 2008
was declared passed on First Reading.
B. Bill No. 46 – 2008 – Amending Zoning Ordinance
– Article 1324 - Fees for Appeal and Article 1325 –
Notice of Hearings
The Clerk read Bill No. 46 – 2008, Amending Zoning
Ordinance – Article 1324 – Fees for Appeal and
Article 1325 – Notice of Hearings, sponsored by Mr.
Reynolds and Ms. Dolan, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM
COUNTIES OF LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON,
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM,
ARTICLE 1324, TITLED ADMINISTRATION, PERMITS AND PENALTIES,
SECTION 1324.03, FEES, AND ARTICLE 1325, TITLED ZONING HEARING
BOARD,
SECTION 1325.04, NOTICE OF HEARINGS
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. Bill No. 46 – 2008
was declared passed on First Reading.
11. RESOLUTIONS
A. Authorizing Records Destruction – EMS
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-211
that authorized the disposition of the public records from
Emergency Medical Services, as listed in Exhibit A, according
to schedules and procedures for the disposition of records
as set forth in the Municipal Records Manual approved on July
16, 1993 and Resolution 13,076.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. The Resolution passed.
B. Authorizing Records Destruction – Compliance Office
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-212
that authorized the disposition of the public records from
the Human Resources, Compliance Office, as listed in Exhibit
A, according to schedules and procedures for the disposition
of records as set forth in the Municipal Records Manual approved
on July 16, 1993 and Resolution 13,076.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. The Resolution passed.
C. Authorizing Execution of Easement Agreement – Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation – Route 412
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-213
that authorized the execution of an Easement Agreement with
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
for the purpose of granting and conveying approximately 0.090
acres of land as a slope easement on a portion of property
of the City of Bethlehem along State Route 412, according
the terms of the agreement.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez, 6. The Resolution passed.
Considering Resolutions as a Group
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan moved to consider Resolutions
11 D through 11 H as a group. Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms.
Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr. Donchez,
6. The motion passed.
D. Certificate of Appropriateness – The Miller’s
House
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-214
that granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to stabilize
the structure with masonry repairs and the installation of
tie-rods with exterior metal tie backs at The Miller’s
House.
E. Certificate of Appropriateness – 439 High Street
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-215
that granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install storm
windows at 439 High Street.
F. Certificate of Appropriateness – 44 East Market
Street
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-216
that granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct
a Memorial Garden at the front of Trinity Episcopal Church
at 44 East Market Street.
G. Certificate of Appropriateness – 80 West Market
Street
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-217
that granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a
projecting sign and awning at 80 West Market Street.
H. Certificate of Appropriateness – 346 West Street
Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 2008-218
that granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install storm
windows at 346 West Street.
Voting AYE on Resolutions 11 D through 11 H: Mrs. Belinski,
Ms. Dolan, Mr. Mowrer, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Schweder, and Mr.
Donchez, 6. The Resolutions passed.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Budget Hearings – Scheduling
President Donchez thanked all involved for their assistance
in the scheduling of the Budget Hearings.
Resolution - Golf Course Restaurant – Hours of Operation
Mr. Reynolds said he would like to entertain a motion to
place before the Members the Resolution that was discussed
at the preceding Parks and Public Property Committee meeting
to allow the Golf Course Restaurant to remain open until Midnight.
President Donchez noted that Christopher Spadoni, City Council
Solicitor, advised that a motion to Suspend the Rules is needed.
Mr. Reynolds moved to Suspend the Rules. There was no second
to the motion. The motion died.
13. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
City Council Meetings – Mayor’s Attendance
Bill Scheirer, 1890 Eaton Avenue, asked the Mayor to put
forth reasons why his attendance at City Council Meetings
promotes good government. Mr. Scheirer said an alternative
to the Mayor having an open door is questions during Courtesy
of the Floor at the end of a Council Meeting similar to a
press conference but with the public. Members of Council and
the public could then see if a question is an example of a
more general situation that could profitably be addressed.
He continued on to say possibly a more important reason for
the Mayor to be present at Council Meetings is that statements
made by the public pose a problem with no immediately apparent
solution and Courtesy of the Floor becomes a community forum
for ideas, and there is value in having various representatives
of City government present. Mr. Scheirer further stated it
is beneficial for the Mayor to be present at Council Meetings
in light of the fact that he is a member of the National League
of Cities’ policy committee on energy, environment,
and natural resources, he is president of the Pennsylvania
League of Cities and Municipalities, and contribute his knowledge
to the community forum.
Various Issues
Terry Meixell, 56 East Goepp Street, noted he sent to the
Members of Council a letter on ethics. Mr. Meixell remarked
it seems that the City is bending over backwards on behalf
of the Golf Course Restaurant including spending money on
code violations and the City is hurting for money. Mr. Meixell
commented that the City is to receive a new fire engine but
does not have the money to pay for it. Mr. Meixell noted his
survey states that the majority of people are against the
Five Points enhancement, and added he does not see the benefits
of it. Mr. Meixell asserted that not many of the City officials
have an ethical conduct. Mr. Meixell requested that he be
provided with an answer why certain things are happening in
the City. Mr. Meixell observed that an outside firm is going
to assess the downtown business districts, and the City is
going to match funds. He questioned why the work is being
subbed out if the City is hurting for money. Mr. Meixell expressed
that since the leaves and snow are not picked up fast enough
an outside concern is going to be hired to do it, and every
resident in the City is going to pay for it. Mr. Meixell stated
that Council should represent the people they were elected
to represent and not special interest groups.
Northampton County Gambling Impact Committee
Robert Pfenning, 2830 Linden Street, informed the assembly
that on December 8, 2008 the Northampton County Executive
disbanded the Northampton County Gambling Impact Committee.
Mr. Pfenning advised at the last meeting he had four members
of the committee talk with their counterparts in Bensalem
Township in Bucks County since they have two years of operational
experience with the casino at Philadelphia Park. Mr. Pfenning
passed on some of the comments made. The Hellertown Police
Chief mentioned the increase in EMS calls, and there was no
additional impact on the Police through the opening, traffic
problems were minimal since all infrastructure was in place,
Bensalem Township hired 20 new Police Officers with the host
fees and new equipment, traffic was spread out through the
day with no tie-ups. The comment of the District Attorney’s
office was an immediate increase in theft and identification
theft. One of the District Justices will cover the hotel,
retail, and conference center and the other will cover the
casino and parking garage, and both felt they needed increased
staff. Mr. Pfenning said John McGeehan from the Northampton
County prison talked to his counterparts and there was no
increase in felonies but there was an increase in misdemeanors.
There was little impact on the Human Services bureau, anecdotal
evidence of impact on seniors, and problems with underage
gambling.
Audit and Budget
Mr. Pfenning said audits are not meant to guarantee the validity
of financial statements and are to fairly present the statements,
and the limited scope of the time and effort does not mean
that any and all irregularities will be found.
Mr. Pfenning urged the Administration and Council to talk
about the same comparisons such as accrual basis fund balance
that included the same $2 million in cash referenced by Mr.
Schweder in the revenue stream.
Various Issues
Eddie Rodriquez, 1845 Linden Street, said the container on
the 400 block of Wyandotte Street needs to be brought back
alongside the building or to the back so that others do not
do the same. Mr. Rodriquez commented that Council should perform
better than they have. Mr. Rodriquez said he did not want
his comments regarding the Mayor’s car omitted in the
minutes and raised further questions. Mr. Rodriquez, asserting
that Council has seen proof that people do not want the one
way streets in the Five Points vicinity, questioned why Council
is voting in favor of the one way traffic pattern and not
in accordance with the wishes of residents and business owners.
Mr. Rodriquez stressed that Council should do what is right
for the people.
Expressions of Thanks
Dana Grubb, 2420 Henderson Place, expressed appreciation
for the information received from the City Clerk’s Office,
and thanked Council for adding a note at the top of the Agenda
to ask that cell phones be turned off.
Martin Tower – Blight Designation
Stephen Antalics, 737 Ridge Street, remarked that the Planning
Commission under duress approved the designation of blight
for Martin Tower at Eighth Avenue. He noted that in 2007 an
area in Chicago was declared blighted because a developer
wanted to improve the interior of buildings in order to bring
in high-end clients. Mr. Antalics questioned what is blighted
in the Martin Tower area, especially in light of the recent
Lowe’s development, and asserted that blight is internal
in the building as was the situation in Chicago. Mr. Antalics
pointed out the person who owns the Martin Tower building
will benefit from the blight designation because they will
put in high-end condominiums. Mr. Antalics referred to a deed
from Lehigh County stating there are three owners of the Martin
Tower building which are Ashley, and Eaton Avenue development
that are each 25% owners, and SWB is 50% owner. Mr. Antalics
explained that after much work he discovered that SWB is Herrick
Company that is a multi-billion dollar company in Florida
with assets all over the country. The tax records from Lehigh
County are sent to Boca Raton, Florida that is the home to
Mr. Herrick. Mr. Antalics questioned why the Herrick company
was not at the Planning Commission meeting, and why someone
with a 25% interest is pleading for money and asking for a
blight designation. Mr. Antalics stressed that the public
will not benefit from the development of Martin Tower, and
the Administration argued for it. Mr. Antalics urged Council
to demand that the majority owner be in the City, and ask
why Pennsylvania should put up public monies for a company
that is in Florida. Mr. Antalics suggested that eminent domain
be used to take over the Martin Tower building and demolish
it.
Parking – South Side
Brandon Kerrigan, 4 West Fourth Street, explained the apartment
in which he lives is zoned commercial, he cannot get a street
parking permit, and two other lots are rented out. Mr. Kerrigan
asked what is the plan for more parking in the area, and pointed
out more apartments are being developed. Mr. Kerrigan communicated
that money to pay for parking tickets could be better used
to help local businesses. President Donchez advised there
is a plan for more parking at the Flatiron Building within
the next two years. Mr. Kerrigan noted he does not have a
labeled truck for his business, and queried if there is a
quicker parking solution. President Donchez suggested that
Mr. Kerrigan meet with the Mayor and Police Commissioner after
the Meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
|