Council Minutes
August 1, 2006 Meeting Minutes
BETHLEHEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING
10 East Church Street - Town Hall
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 – 7:30 PM
1. INVOCATION
2. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
President J. Michael Schweder called the meeting to order.
Pastor Don Quayle, of Christ Church-United Church of Christ,
offered the invocation which was followed by the pledge to
the flag. Present were Jean Belinski, Karen Dolan, Robert
J. Donchez, Magdalena F. Szabo, and J. Michael Schweder, 5.
Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., and Gordon B. Mowrer were absent, 2.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Minutes of July 5, 2006 and July 18, 2006 were approved.
5. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR (for public comment on Ordinances
and Resolutions to be voted on by Council this evening –
5 Minute Time Limit)
Proposed Ordinance to Acquire Easements – Replacement
of Sanitary Sewers – Homestead Avenue Area
Attorney Tamer Ahmed advised he is at the City Council Meeting
this evening on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Mark Pammer of 1822
Eaton Avenue, Mr. and Mrs. Steven Schlack of 1840 Eaton Avenue,
and Margaret Miller of 1820 Eaton Avenue, and he noted Ms.
Miller was not at the Meeting this evening. Attorney Ahmed
stated he is asking that City Council reconsider the passing
of Bill No. 26 – 2006, Acquiring Easements – Replacement
of Sanitary Sewers – Homestead Avenue, Highland Avenue
and Eaton Avenue. Acknowledging he understands it is the City’s
right to pass the Ordinance with regard to condemnation, Attorney
Ahmed explained the residents are asking that they have a
fair deal in negotiation of their easements. Attorney Ahmed
communicated what the passing of the condemnation Ordinance
does is take away the fairness in the negotiation process.
Communicating the awkwardness “when we’re sitting
at a table and I have this condemnation over my head,”
Attorney Ahmed said at this time what he is asking is that
City Council hold off on the Ordinance and do a good faith
effort in negotiating with the property owners as to whether
or not the easements can be acquired at a reasonable price.
If that fails, Attorney Ahmed stated “we’ll come
back here next month and pass the Ordinance.” Attorney
Ahmed noted it is his understanding that a letter was sent
to the property owners in June saying “you’ll
get an offer for this easement and once you get the offer
within two weeks you have to reply to us. They didn’t
get an offer in June. Again, in July they were here, and they
were [told] an offer is coming. They didn’t get an offer.
And,…July 28th they get this memo saying, by the way,
on August 1st we’re passing this condemnation Ordinance.
So, what we’re asking again is that we take a step back,
hold off on this condemnation Ordinance, let the City officials
and these folks have a good faith effort negotiating this
easement, and see where that comes about.”
President Schweder, while noting he will address the subject
when it comes before the Members, affirmed all are very cognizant
of the concerns expressed by Attorney Ahmed, and stated that
a way to work through the matter should be found.
6. OLD BUSINESS
Commerce Center Boulevard Project – LVIP VII –
Northampton County Bond Issue
Mr. Donchez recalled that in two newspapers it has been reported
that there is $2,000,000 remaining for the Commerce Center
Boulevard project at LVIP VII from the $13,150,000 presented
to the City of Bethlehem through the Northampton County Bond
Issue. Highlighting the fact that the roadway project came
in under budget and ahead of schedule, Mr. Donchez expressed
concern about the tone of some of the newspaper articles as
reported by the County. Noting that Northampton County Council
may be voting on the issue this week, Mr. Donchez questioned
if City Council should go on record saying that the $2,000,000
was allocated for the City of Bethlehem, a great job was done
with the Commerce Center Boulevard project in that it came
in ahead of schedule and under budget, and hopefully the $2,000,000
will remain so that more infrastructure improvements can be
made in the Commerce Center Boulevard project at LVIP VII,
and the money would not be used anywhere else. Reiterating
his request, Mr. Donchez queried if it would be worthwhile
for Council to go on record stating that the original intent
of the $2,000,000 should be used in the City of Bethlehem
and it would be used in LVIP VII for the Commerce Center Boulevard
project.
President Schweder suggested if that is what the Members
of Council want to do then correspondence could be developed
and delivered to Northampton County Council prior to their
meeting. Upon the indication by Members of Council of their
concurrence, President Schweder directed the Clerk to forward
requested correspondence.
7. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Director of Planning and Zoning – Street Vacation
– Greenleaf Street
The Clerk read a memorandum dated July 17, 2006 from Darlene
L. Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, advising that
at their meeting of July 13, 2006, the Planning Commission
voted to recommend approval of the street vacation request
for Greenleaf Street. Attached was a memorandum dated July
7, 2006 of Findings of Fact and Recommendation from Ms. Heller
to the Planning Commission Members along with the petition
to vacate Greenleaf Street submitted by Attorney James F.
Preston on behalf of Ashley Development Corporation who has
submitted to the City a Land Development Plan entitled "Greenleaf
Commons". The vacation eliminates a dead end stub street
from the City's public street system, minimizing future maintenance.
President Schweder requested that the Law Bureau draft the
Street Vacation Ordinance.
B. Director of Public Works – Paint Mill Bridge Replacement
– Federal Aid Reimbursement Agreement
The Clerk read a memorandum dated July 25, 2006 from Michael
Alkhal, Director of Public Works, to which was attached a
Federal Aid Reimbursement Agreement for the Paint Mill Bridge
Replacement on Schoenersville Road over the Monocacy Creek.
This is an amendment to Agreement No. 050218-E to add funds
in the amount of $46,423.32 to the total amount of the reimbursement
agreement with PennDOT. This amendment is necessary to pay
for the (1) completion of miscellaneous extra work items,
(2) reconciliation of payment on all construction quantities
that differed from estimated bid quantities, (3) increased
costs of PPL light pole relocations, and (4) increased costs
of Norfolk Southern Railroad to upgrade the railroad crossing
near the bridge. The breakdown of the costs was illustrated
on the attached spreadsheet. As is standard procedure for
this project, the City will be reimbursed 95% of the total
increased cost.
President Schweder stated that authorizing Resolution 11
K is listed on the Agenda.
C. City Solicitor – Proposed Ordinance to Amend Article
509 – Enforcement and General Penalty, and Article 717
– Noises
The Clerk read a memorandum dated July 28, 2006 from John
F. Spirk, Jr., Esq., City Solicitor, to which was attached
proposed ordinances to amend Article 509, Enforcement and
General Penalty, and Article 717, Noises.
President Schweder referred the matter to the Public Safety
Committee and to the Community Development Committee.
D. City Solicitor – Proposed Ordinance to Acquire Easements
– Replacement of Sanitary Sewers – Homestead Avenue
Area
The Clerk read a memorandum dated July 28, 2006 from John
F. Spirk, Jr., Esq., City Solicitor, to which was attached
a proposed Ordinance to authorize the acquisition of easements
by condemnation in connection with the replacement of sanitary
sewers along Homestead Avenue, Highland Avenue and Eaton Avenue.
In the memorandum it was noted that the Administration is
still proceeding to obtain appraisals in order to attempt
to acquire all the easements necessary for this project by
agreement with the property owners, and thereby avoid the
need for condemnation. However, at Councilman Leeson’s
request the Law Bureau simultaneously forwarded the condemnation
authorization ordinance, so that if attempts to purchase the
easements prove unsuccessful, the City can move without further
delay to proceed by condemnation. The ordinance will authorize
such condemnation and will empower the City to file a declaration
of taking in court any time within one year of the effective
date of this ordinance. Condemnation itself does not occur
until a declaration of taking is filed in court. If all easements
are acquired by purchase, no such court action will ever be
necessary.
President Schweder stated that Bill No. 26 – 2006 is
on the Agenda for First Reading.
E. Zoning Text Amendment – CS and IR Districts –
Licensed Gaming Facilities and Retail
The Clerk read a letter dated July 27, 2006 from J. Scott
Kramer on behalf of Bethworks Now, LLC and Sands Bethworks
Gaming LLC, owners of the property located at 603 East First
Street, proposing Zoning text amendments to the CS and IR
Districts for Licensed Gaming Facilities and Retail.
Mr. Donchez commented when he read the proposed Zoning Ordinance
he was struck that it did not have some possible restrictions
of certain establishments or within a 1,000 feet of certain
buildings, etc. Mr. Donchez recalled such possible restrictions
were something that have been discussed many times before,
such as at the City Council Meeting held at Broughal Middle
School last year. Mr. Donchez, noting he is under the impression
that the Administration is working on separate Zoning amendments
to address some of the concerns he has just referenced, and
that other Members of Council have concerns about, said he
would like to know what is the timeframe for the second Zoning
Ordinance that the Administration is working on to come to
City Council so that possibly there could be a Public Hearing
on both proposed Ordinances.
Tony Hanna, Director of Community and Economic Development,
responded the Administration looked at the matter as an additional
Ordinance that would be additive to the conditions that were
raised in the first Ordinance. Mr. Hanna continued on to say
the Ordinance that was proposed by Sands-BethWorks had to
do with uses so as to clarify the ambiguity around the use
per se, and they also addressed a few issues related to parking
and mapping. Mr. Hanna continued on to say the Department
had always contemplated coming up with an additional Ordinance
that would deal with some of the restrictions on uses, particularly
in the surrounding neighborhoods. Mr. Hanna advised it is
the expectation that something would be ready that would be
introduced via the Planning Commission and would then be referred
to City Council following the Planning Commission’s
meeting on August 17. In order to comply with the 30 day requirement,
Mr. Hanna said it would be hoped that the Public Hearing scheduled
by Council could be at least 30 days after that Planning Commission
meeting. Mr. Hanna stated it would be the expectation that
the Department could then refer both the Planning Commission
sponsored Ordinance and the Ordinance that has been proffered
by Sands-BethWorks to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission
on or about August 18, 2006 so that Council’s Public
Hearing would be 30 days thereafter or September 19, 2006.
Mr. Donchez asked should the proposed Ordinance that the
Department is working on come to City Council at the next
meeting to be read into the record and then it would be referred
to the Planning Commission.
President Schweder noted the Administration has the discretion
to consider it without sending it to City Council first.
Mr. Hanna affirmed that it would be sent to City Council
for action as has been done in the past. Mr. Hanna explained
there would essentially be two Ordinances tracking through
Council, one from Sands-BethWorks and an additional Ordinance
from the Administration via the Planning Commission, and City
Council would deal with the two Ordinances simultaneously.
Mr. Donchez commented it was his hope that there would be
a separate Ordinance addressing some of Council’s concerns
and that it be reviewed at the same time as the Ordinance
proposed by Sands-BethWorks.
Mr. Hanna, advising that the Department’s proposal
would be sent to City Council and to the Lehigh Valley Planning
Commission, said the Department wanted to be sure the two
Ordinances could be considered and it would require that the
Public Hearing be no earlier than September 19, 2006.
Mr. Donchez requested, as a courtesy, when the proposed
Ordinance is sent to the Planning Commission that City Council
also receive a copy.
President Schweder, recommending that the proposal contained
in Communication 7 E be sent to the Planning Commission and
the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission, said he would accept
a motion that the Public Hearing on the two Ordinances would
be held Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 7:30 PM in Town Hall.
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to set the Public Hearing
on the proposed Ordinance from Sands-BethWorks as contained
in Communication 7 E and the proposed Ordinance to be received
from the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 19, 2006
at 7:30 PM in Town Hall.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The motion passed.
8 . REPORTS
A. President of Council
None.
B. Mayor
None.
C. Human Resources and Environment Committee
Ms. Dolan, Chairwoman of the Human Resources and Environment
Committee, presented an oral report of the Committee’s
meeting held on July 28, 2006 on the following subjects: Environmental
Advisory Council (EAC) – Potential Creation and Tunkhannock
Creek – Exceptional Value Petition – Discussion.
9. ORDINANCES FOR FINAL PASSAGE
A. Bill No. 24 – 2006 – Amending General Fund
Budget – Parks and Public Property Department –
Mechanical Equipment Repairs; Health Bureau – Pediatric
Outreach
The Clerk read Bill No. 24 - 2006, Amending General Fund
Budget – Parks and Public Property Department –
Mechanical Equipment Repairs; and Health Bureau – Pediatric
Outreach, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. Bill No. 24 – 2006, hereafter to
be known as Ordinance 4388, was declared adopted.
B. Bill No. 25 – 2006 – Amending Non-Utility
Capital Budget – Paint Mill Bridge; Temporary Assistance
to Needy Families (TANF) Program
The Clerk read Bill No. 25 - 2006, Amending Non-Utility
Capital Budget – Paint Mill Bridge; Temporary Assistance
to Needy Families (TANF) Program, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. Bill No. 25 – 2006, hereafter to
be known as Ordinance 4389, was declared adopted.
10. NEW ORDINANCES
A. Bill No. 26 – 2006 – Acquiring Easements –
Replacement of Sanitary Sewers –
Homestead Avenue, Highland Avenue and Eaton Avenue
The Clerk read Bill No. 26 - 2006, Acquiring Easements –
Replacement of Sanitary Sewers – Homestead Avenue, Highland
Avenue and Eaton Avenue, sponsored by Mrs. Belinski and Ms.
Szabo, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY SOLICITOR
AND/OR THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO SELECT
AND APPROPRIATE CERTAIN PLOTS OF GROUND WITH
THE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON SITUATED FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ACQUIRING EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF SANITARY SEWERS IN
THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM.
President Schweder asked whether there is an impact or necessity
for action related to eminent domain in order to begin in
phase 1, if there is a way to do what is necessary without
having to bring about eminent domain, and whether a delay
will be caused in the City’s ability to do the required
work in that neighborhood.
David Brong, Director of Water and Sewer Resources, replied
these easements are the most downstream portion of the area
of the sewer that is going to be upgraded. Mr. Brong explained
the project cannot start from above because of the diameter
of the pipe that is going to be increased, and the elevation
that is going to be lowered in many areas. Mr. Brong said
he does not see any other alternatives than to obtain easements
and start in the referenced location.
President Schweder inquired what has been done to date in
terms of negotiations.
John F. Spirk, Jr., City Solicitor, responded “we
didn’t negotiate. We’re not going to start negotiating
until we have all the appraisals of all the properties.”
In response to President Schweder’s question as to when
would that occur, Attorney Spirk advised he is told by Monday.
President Schweder recounted that two weeks ago it was indicated
they would be available by tonight.
Michael Alkhal, Director of Public Works, explained that
the description of the right of way is what was discussed
at the last City Council Meeting, and added “we never
talked about when all the appraisals will be completed by
Laudone and Associates…” Mr. Alkhal advised that
he spoke with Joseph Kelly, Assistant City Solicitor, today
and he was promised by Laudone and Associates that all the
appraisals will be in the City’s hands by Monday. Then,
Mr. Alkhal affirmed, letters will be sent to the property
owners.
President Schweder inquired if the negotiation process would
begin at that point on Monday when the appraisals have been
received.
Attorney Spirk, replying yes, noted “we didn’t
want to do them piecemeal. We wanted to have all the appraisals,
[and] compare them to each other before we started negotiating
on any of them.” Attorney Spirk noted the Ordinance
is on Council’s Agenda tonight at the request of Councilman
Leeson.
President Schweder expressed that, while Council does not
want to see the project delayed, he does understand the plight
of the people who are named in this Ordinance who received
the letter yesterday. President Schweder, stating if Council
can be assured there will be appraisals before the next City
Council Meeting, and that good faith negotiations will begin,
asked Mr. Brong if it would be possible to wait for another
week.
Mr. Brong, responding it is a question of “how much
of a window do we want to provide ourselves” said “I
don’t think we want to leave it unbounded on the back
end but I don’t think we want to be unreasonable either.”
Mr. Brong expressed he could live with it.
President Schweder noted what is being said is that the
Ordinance could be passed over this evening and, at the very
least, look at the matter in two weeks after the City has
received the information; or, Council could vote on the Ordinance
on First Reading this evening that would not have final standing,
and in two weeks, it could be decided whether or not to take
final action.
Ms. Dolan, acknowledging there is a two week period before
final action would take place, pointed out that City Council
has often expressed frustration about the speed of the project.
She stated this is an attempt to make sure that the project
can move along in a timely fashion. Ms. Dolan stressed she
is very sympathetic with the word condemnation, and expressed
she would not want the word used with reference to her property.
Ms. Dolan continued on to say, at the same time, as long as
there is the good faith negotiation that everyone wants, she
would like to see the Ordinance passed on First Reading, and
in two weeks review the issue in light of new information
from the Administration.
Ms. Szabo queried can the Ordinance be rejected on the second
or Final Reading.
President Schweder confirmed that Council’s vote on
Final Reading is not contingent on the First Reading vote.
In further response to Ms. Szabo, President Schweder denoted
if Members of Council made a determination that they were
not pleased with the progress in the next two weeks then they
would have the option of tabling the Ordinance, rejecting
it, or approving it.
Ms. Szabo asked that Michael Alkhal, Director of Public
Works, take her to the site to show her the land in question.
Ms. Szabo remarked that, although she and Mrs. Belinski sponsored
the Ordinance, it does not mean “we’re scrooge”.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. Bill No. 26 – 2006 was declared
passed on First Reading.
11. RESOLUTIONS
A. Adopting Sewage Facilities Plan Revision – Cottages
at Monocacy Creek – Township Line Road
Mrs. Belinski and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,888
to amend the City's Official Sewage Facilities Plan for the
proposal of Nic Zawarski & Sons to develop a parcel of
land identified as Cottages at Monocacy Creek, proposing that
the subdivision be served by sewer tap-ins, sewer extension,
pump station and force main; and submitting the revision to
the Department of Environmental Protection for approval.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
B. Adopting Sewage Facilities Plan Revision – LVIP
VII – Bethlehem Commerce Center – Easton Road
Mrs. Belinski and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,889
to amend the City's Official Sewage Facilities Plan for a
proposed development of a parcel land identified as LVIP VII
BCC Easton Road II, proposing that the subdivision be served
by sewer tap-ins, sewer extension, pump station and force
main; and submitting the revision to the Department of Environmental
Protection for approval.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
C. Approving Use Permit Agreement – 2006 Celtic Classic
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 14,890 that
authorized the execution of a Use Permit Agreement between
Celtic Fest, Inc. d/b/a Celtic Cultural Alliance and the City
for use of public properties and streets for Celtic Classic
2006 for the time periods from September 9, 2006 to October
1, 2006, according to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
D. Approving Use Permit Agreement – Senior Centers of
Bethlehem – Parking Cars During 2006 Celtic Classic
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski sponsored Resolution 14,891
which authorized the execution of the Use Permit Agreement
between the City and Senior Centers of Bethlehem for use of
Johnston Park for parking cars during 2006 Celtic Classic
for the time period September 22, 2006 to September 24, 2006,
according to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
E. Approving Use Permit Agreement – Senior Centers
of Bethlehem – Parking Cars During Musikfest
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski sponsored Resolution 14,892
which authorized the execution of the Use Permit Agreement
between the City and Senior Centers of Bethlehem for use of
Johnston Park for parking cars during Musikfest 2006 for the
time period August 4, 2006 to August 13, 2006, according to
the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
F. Authorizing Highway Safety Project Grant – Health
Bureau
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski sponsored Resolution 14,893
that authorized the execution of grant documents for Highway
Safety Grant Project No. CP 07-21-1 which will provide funds
from October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 for education
and prevention relative to aggressive driving, alcohol-related
crashes, unbelted crashes, pedestrian safety and youth driving.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
G. Certificate of Appropriateness – 210-212 East Third
Street
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 11 G to grant
a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the facades of 210-212
East Third Street.
President Schweder, observing this is another incident of
retroactive approval, highlighted the fact that people did
things on the property without ever getting approval by the
South Bethlehem Historic Conservation Commission and after
the fact the work was rubber stamped by the Commission. President
Schweder inquired, if the Resolution were to be voted down,
what enforcement mechanism would there be at that point.
Tony Hanna, Director of Community and Economic Development,
explained that attempts have been made to try to counsel the
property owner, it was discovered that the work was going
on, and a citation was issued. Affirming it has been a problem
property for years as everyone is aware, Mr. Hanna advised
the property owner has been cited for years, and the property
owner transferred ownership to his daughter. Informing President
Schweder that the property owner was forced to come before
the Board, Mr. Hanna noted the owner responded rather quickly
but work had already commenced. Further advising that the
Historic Officer worked with the owner in terms of what was
being done, and the owner came as a “walk-on”
to the last meeting of the South Bethlehem Historic Conservation
Commission, Mr. Hanna commented that the owner did respond
in good faith. Mr. Hanna observed if the Members of Council
do not vote in favor of the Resolution, then the City would
probably be in a position where it would cite the owners but
queried “what’s our remedy.” He commented
that ultimately the owner would have to be provided with an
opportunity to remedy the citation which would be going before
the Commission.
President Schweder, recalling there have been a number of
such situations recently and there was a case where Council
turned down what had been done, thought at some point there
should be a discussion about what should be done with respect
to such situations.
Mr. Hanna informed the Members of a situation on the North
Side where a property owner is refusing to go before the Historic
and Architectural Review Board, and the owner was cited today.
Mary Pongracz, member of the South Bethlehem Historic Conservation
Commission, said, to the best of her knowledge this matter
was tabled at the last meeting, and the Commission did not
vote to accept the project.
President Schweder stated that the Resolution will be passed
over this evening.
Motion – Considering Resolutions as a Group
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to consider Resolutions
11 H, 11 I, and 11 J as a group. Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski,
Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 5. The
motion passed.
H. Certificate of Appropriateness – 302 East Third
Street
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 14,894 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the facades
at 302 East Third Street.
I. Certificate of Appropriateness – 400 Block of Wyandotte
Street
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 14,895 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to restore the upper
floor facades of the east side of the 400 block of Wyandotte
Street.
J. Certificate of Appropriateness – 13-15 East Third
Street
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Dolan sponsored Resolution 14,896 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the storefront
cornice at 13-15 East Third Street.
Mrs. Belinski, observing that Resolution 11 I addresses the
area where the old Ale House is located on the corner property,
said she is so glad to see that the property will finally
be restored, although the work will be done only on the second
and third floors.
Voting AYE on Resolutions 11 H through 11 J: Mrs. Belinski,
Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 5. The
Resolutions passed.
K. Approving Federal Aid Reimbursement Agreement –
Paint Mill Bridge Replacement – Schoenersville Road
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski sponsored Resolution 14,897
that authorized the execution of Supplemental Federal Aid
Bridge Project Agreement No. 050218-F between the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, acting through the Pennsylvania Department
of Transportation, and the City, for the Paint Mill (Schoenersville
Road) Bridge over the Monocacy Creek Project, in accordance
with the Agreement.
Voting AYE: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Dolan, Mr. Donchez, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 5. The Resolution passed.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Committee Meeting Announcement
Mr. Donchez, in the absence of Mr. Leeson, Chairman of the
Finance Committee, announced a meeting on August 9, 2006 at
4:00 p.m. in the Mayor’s Conference Room.
710 Dellwood Street
Ms. Dolan, informing the Members that she received correspondence
and a petition concerning a property at 710 Dellwood Street,
said she will be forwarding this matter to the enforcement
staff of the Administration and asking that there be focus
on this particular property. Explaining that the petition
was not copied for all Members of Council because it was a
petition to the owner, Ms. Dolan noted that Christopher Spadoni,
City Council Solicitor, had indicated the information should
be referred to the Administration for action.
Multiple Offenses at Properties
Ms. Dolan, referring to her memorandum sent to Mr. Hanna,
queried whether there are Ordinances that would address the
problem of multiple offenses at a single property or of a
single owner, including those offenses that cross Departmental
boundaries.
Mr. Hanna, noting that the City’s Ordinances call
for increasing fines for multiple violations, affirmed that
the Ordinances are utilized, but added that it requires the
cooperation of the Magistrate and the property owner. Mr.
Hanna, advising there will be a more detailed response provided
in a memorandum, affirmed there are provisions for steep and
increasing fines, and even incarceration, if there is a repeat
offender. Mr. Hanna pointed out that, due to the way citations
are issued, there are multiple violations for health issues
such as repeat offenses for weeds, garbage, etc. Mr. Hanna
added there are increasing fines issued for housing violations.
Mr. Hanna further noted that the City will correct a violation
and place a lien on the property. Mr. Hanna felt there are
adequate mechanisms at present in the Ordinances. Mr. Hanna,
focusing on the licensing procedure, affirmed there is an
Ordinance with the licensing procedure for regulated rental
units but there is not a licensing procedure for non-regulated
rental units.
Ms. Dolan explained that the neighbors in the area of 710
Dellwood Street were concerned because each of the items dealt
with either a different Ordinance or a different Department,
and when they communicated with the different Departments
they were not sure there was a data base that connected the
violations so they could be tracked across Departments.
Mr. Hanna confirmed the Department does have a data base
that can track violations between the Health and Housing Bureaus,
while there is a separate data base for building code issues.
Mr. Hanna affirmed that City Council receives a weekly report
from the Health Bureau, and added that a similar process will
be set up for Housing related issues.
Saucon Creek – Exposed Pipe
Ms. Dolan, turning to a memorandum of July 28, 2006 pertaining
to photographs of a pipe at Saucon Creek, said she wanted
to make sure Council will be kept abreast of the situation.
Mrs. Belinski noted she is aware of matters related to Conectiv
Energy and impact on some of the surrounding areas, and added
she has received complaints.
Bethlehem Housing Authority
Ms. Dolan, noting that the Bethlehem Housing Authority’s
City Council Liaison Committee met, affirmed she is City Council’s
liaison to the Bethlehem Housing Authority (BHA). Ms. Dolan
advised the BHA asked her to pass along the suggestion that,
since the BHA currently contracts out for grass cutting, the
BHA was wondering whether the City would be interested in
taking on the job that could provide a source of revenue to
the City.
Mrs. Belinski, Chairwoman of the Parks and Public Property
Committee, explained that, as a result of two entry level
positions being eliminated in the Parks and Public Property
Department, the employees are hard pressed to keep up with
the work they have. Consequently, Mrs. Belinski thought the
Department would not be in a position to take on additional
work, and expressed that she wished the City could afford
to hire more employees to do all the work in the Department.
Ms. Dolan, turning to another suggestion about whether it
would be possible and/or feasible for the BHA and the City
to work together for purchasing certain bulk items, perhaps
bringing down the cost for both entities, affirmed that a
response was received from Dennis Reichard, Business Administrator.
Ms. Dolan added she is happy to see that the BHA will be contacted
regarding possibilities for cooperative purchases.
Mayor’s Absence at Council Meeting
President Schweder, in response to Ms. Szabo, advised that
the Mayor is on official business tonight.
13. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
Neighborhood Problems
Karl Fluck, 312 Summit Street, informed the assembly he
is at the meeting to address 614 Spring Street where the Police
responded 106 times within a year for apparent violations
that were intimidating residents. Mr. Fluck, stressing he
cannot imagine why something was not done after the 30th,
40th, 50th, or 60th call, asserted there has to be some protocol
for public safety. Advising he called the Police 8 times having
to do with houses in his neighborhood, Mr. Fluck said he called
the Police on July 4, 2006 when firecrackers were thrown at
him. After the Police Officer left, a charge was set off inside
a recycling bin, and firecrackers were thrown on his sidewalk.
Affirming that he testified in court against the perpetrators,
Mr. Fluck remarked they are going to retaliate against him,
and said he is “not going to be a target of opportunity.”
Mr. Fluck continued on to state he is not going to abandon
the principles that he knows and understands or the rule of
law, but he is hard pressed not to take some action against
these individuals on his own. Noting that the Police Department
is locking up people as fast as they can, Mr. Fluck remarked
that giving these people the equivalent of a parking ticket
“isn’t just going to make it. We need to take
some serious steps…”. Mr. Fluck, noting that in
his particular circumstance where he lives he decided he is
going to take some action, advised that he met with Stuart
Bedics, Deputy Police Commissioner. Mr. Fluck found out that,
under Section 8 programs, the Bethlehem Housing Authority
can withhold payments and evict tenants with respect to the
drug and nuisance act, and the act also enumerates what citizens
and block watches can do. Mr. Fluck stated he is not going
to move simply because the City cannot figure out a way to
stop these people who do not care about the law, or what happens
to them, and are not intimidated. Mr. Fluck stated the City
is going to have to figure out a way to deal with the issue
because otherwise people are going to be killed. Stressing
that drug dealers have to be attacked, Mr. Fluck commented
the way to attack them is through the existing statutes under
primarily the housing rental code through the Bethlehem Housing
Authority that controls the Section 8 certificates. Mr. Fluck
continued on to say there is still the ability under the statute
to attack the landlords personally. He further communicated
there needs to be a coordination of City Departments to address
the problems and there needs to be an all-out effort. Informing
the assembly he is going to draft a plan of action, Mr. Fluck
said if he has to put together his own militia he is going
to do it.
Bethlehem Crime Statistics; Adding Police Officers
William Scheirer, 1890 Eaton Avenue, said a week ago Town
Hall was overflowing with people wishing to learn more about
gangs in Bethlehem, and it was an indication to him of the
increasing concern in the City about the rising tide of violence.
Mr. Scheirer related that, in response to his question at
that meeting, Officer William McCauley said his best guess
was that there are about 200 gang members in Bethlehem, some
have dropped out since his compilation, but that others have
joined and the overall number may have increased. Recalling
that the Bethlehem Citizens Association has requested that
the Police force be increased from 146 to 166 officers over
a five year period, Mr. Scheirer stated this would still be
less than one officer per gang member. Mr. Scheirer noted
that at the last City Council Meeting it was said the City
now has the largest police force in the history of Bethlehem.
Mr. Scheirer expressed that is relevant, but not a compelling
argument. He continued on to note it was also said at the
last Council Meeting that increasing the size of the Police
force would necessitate reductions elsewhere in the budget.
Mr. Scheirer stated if it can be accomplished in this way,
so much the better. He felt everyone should try harder this
year to find $240,000 that is the cost of the first increment
of four Officers. He commented that City officials should
look for items that are less important than more officers,
and not important enough to raise taxes. Mr. Scheirer remarked
that, in the event such items cannot be found, then a tax
increase will be necessary to fund more Officers. Mr. Scheirer
observed that the attendance at the meeting on gangs tells
him that the voters would endorse such an increase.
Commerce Center Boulevard Project – Funding from Northampton
County
Robert Pfenning, 2830 Linden Street, related that at the
Northampton County’s finance committee meeting last
week, the Commerce Center Boulevard project was on the agenda,
as was the County’s current fiscal problems. Mr. Pfenning
noted some members of County Council are reviewing various
sources to get money, one of which was the $2,000,000 remaining
from the Commerce Center Boulevard project since they felt
whatever may be remaining after the original project completion
should come back to the County. Mr. Pfenning continued on
to relate that Kerry Wrobel, Executive Vice President of Lehigh
Valley Industrial Park, presented his case to County Council,
and the members asked what is the impact in the absence of
the $2,000,000. Mr. Wrobel’s reply was that the money
would have to be borrowed. Advising that the County Council
finance committee voted 2 to 2 regarding forwarding a recommendation
to Northampton County Council that, in essence, “killed
the recommendation”, Mr. Pfenning stated the $2,000,000
went into limbo and a member of County Council has to bring
forward a Resolution to expend the $2,000,000. Mr. Pfenning
thought the $2,000,000 request will pass along party lines.
However, Mr. Pfenning communicated it is pitting the City
of Bethlehem in expanding its industrial park versus the residents
of Gracedale who are experiencing leaks in their rooms.
Various Issues; Community Meeting
Eddie Rodriquez, 1845 Linden Street, thanked Michael Alkhal,
Director of Public Works, for his help regarding trees, answering
questions, and assistance in the area of Itaska and Ontario
Streets. Mr. Rodriquez also expressed his appreciation for
the work of Charles Brown, Director of Parks and Public Property,
and to Stuart Bedics, Deputy Police Commissioner. Mr. Rodriquez
pointed out that people are coming into the City and are littering
the streets at a faster rate than they can be cleaned. Mr.
Rodriquez felt that the Police Department must be encouraged
to continually go after the drug dealers. Mr. Rodriquez said
the problem arises in a shortage of Police Officers in Bethlehem.
He added the person receiving the call must maintain control
and be as respectful as possible, or the caller will not call
again and will lose faith in the Administration. Mr. Rodriquez
said elected officials can volunteer a time to work in the
community. Mr. Rodriquez informed the assembly that he is
organizing a community meeting on September 27, 2006 at 7:00
PM at the Ice House to give an opportunity to Bethlehem residents
to express their concerns and the problems facing their neighborhoods.
Mr. Rodriquez recounted that he has contacted the City numerous
times about the various problems in the 500 block of Broadway.
Mr. Rodriquez restated that officials must carefully respond
in a respectful manner in order to gain the community’s
trust. Mr. Rodriquez invited everyone in the audience, City
of Bethlehem residents, and Members of Council to his meeting.
Mr. Rodriquez added that he has invited pastors in the City,
Hogar Crea, detoxification centers, and many other people
and organizations in the City to the meeting.
Proposed Ordinance to Acquire Easements – Replacement
of Sanitary Sewers – Homestead Avenue Area
Attorney Tamer Ahmed asked for some confirmation from the
Administration that in the next two week period there will
be an actual negotiation, follow-up, or actual offer for his
clients because if there is not anything happening in that
two week period he would be back again in two weeks saying
the exact same thing that is being said tonight.
President Schweder, expressing the hope that is the affirmation
he received from Attorney Spirk in discussing the matter of
conducting negotiations in good faith, said if that has not
taken place over the next two weeks he does not see any reason
for Council to vote finally on the Ordinance.
Attorney Ahmed, clarifying that his clients are not against
the easement, said they know they have to be done, and they
want to work with the City.
President Schweder noted the Members of Council over the
last year have been very supportive of trying to get done
what needs to be done, and to look at ways to accomplish the
work faster than was being contemplated, and added Council
will continue to do that.
Commerce Center Boulevard Project – Funding from Northampton
County
Ms. Szabo asked Attorney Spirk, in lieu of the Mayor, what
action is being taken regarding the Commerce Center Boulevard
project. Highlighting the fact that she attended all meetings
for three years relative to the matter, Ms. Szabo said the
money was set up fully for the Commerce Center. She continued
on to say the Commerce Center is not going to be finished
for years because the project is waiting for the owner to
take over the 600 acres.
Attorney Spirk noted he would defer to Mr. Alkhal and Mr.
Hanna who were at the County Council meeting.
Mr. Alkhal affirmed that the Northampton County Bond Issue
contained a little over $13,000,000 for Commerce Center Boulevard
and was primarily identified as being for Commerce Center
Boulevard and associated infrastructure. Mr. Alkhal advised
as of this past week it is 100% complete except for some punch
list items on the Commerce Center Boulevard and the extension
that connects the community to Commerce Center Boulevard.
Mr. Alkhal continued on to explain that when the City received
the $13 million it wanted to make sure there was sufficient
funding to do a minimum that was envisioned in close cooperation
with Lehigh Valley Industrial Park (LVIP) to facilitate and
promote development, and in building the Commerce Center itself.
Since the initial design, the cost was estimated and the project
was scaled back to make sure it could be done with a maximum
of $13 million. Confirming the City was successful in doing
so, Mr. Alkhal said, as a result, there is some money left
over that was earmarked for the Commerce Center. Mr. Alkhal,
advising that LVIP has identified an additional access road
that leads to slag areas three and four as an infrastructure
that would be key to continuing the momentum and to promote
and develop the site, informed the Members that is what the
City wants to use the remaining funds for.
Ms. Szabo queried whether the County is opposing the described
plan.
Mr. Alkhal noted, as was indicated, the County has overruns
on another project and some County Council members feel there
is money left with which the City is doing additional work,
and they would rather have the money go back and cover that
overrun as opposed to having the money used at the Commerce
Center. Mr. Alkhal explained that, obviously, the City feels
it should be used at the Commerce Center, the City has done
a good job in using the money it received from the County,
and to promote the site it should continue doing so.
Ms. Szabo recounted that, when she attended the County Council
meetings, some of which lasted until 1:00 or 2:00 a.m., people
from Bethlehem were identified as Bethlehem Steel lackeys,
and remarked with enduring that type of environment she feels
the money was earned. Ms. Szabo stressed that she hopes the
City will continue to make an effort to use the money where
it was meant to be used.
National Night Out
Carol Ann Krasley, Center Street, noting that today has
been designated National Night Out, expressed something that
everyone can do with minimal effort and cost would be to light
the front and rear entryways to homes. She added that, as
a safety issue, it is very advantageous.
Second Public Gang Awareness Presentation
Mrs. Krasley requested a second public gang awareness presentation.
She advised that the meeting recently held was quite well
attended, community interest is high, and the public is willing
to be educated.
Environmental Advisory Council
Peter Crownfield, 559 Brighton Street, referring to the
Human Resources and Environment Committee meeting of July
28, 2006, noted about 40-50 people attended. Mr. Crownfield
pointed out that everyone who spoke very strongly urged the
prompt formation of an Environmental Advisory Council. Mr.
Crownfield observed that Mr. Mowrer and Ms. Szabo were determined
not to take any action at the meeting. Exclaiming he has been
at other committee meetings where items that were not on the
agenda were acted upon, Mr. Crownfield expressed his concern
about the triumph of procedure over substance. Mr. Crownfield
commented if someone on Council could explain the reason why
no action could be taken it would be helpful.
President Schweder responded there was nothing before the
Committee to vote on, and added there was neither a Resolution
nor an Ordinance. Advising that he and Chairwoman Dolan have
had discussions about the matter, President Schweder pointed
out what was required was a piece of legislation. Explaining
the meeting probably should not have gone forward at that
point, President Schweder noted he did say that it would in
deference to the people invited by Ms. Dolan who were coming
from out of town. President Schweder added that Committee
meetings are not normally held at 1:00 p.m. but rather in
the evening so the greatest number of people can come forward.
President Schweder commented that when an Ordinance is drafted
it will be referred to the Committee for action.
Ms. Szabo affirmed that both she and Mr. Mowrer had stated
they would like more information. Ms. Szabo, highlighting
the fact that tonight an Ordinance was tabled, expressed she
sees no harm by something being tabled for another time so
that hopefully more information can be gathered. Emphasizing
that an excellent job was done in selling the plan and she
thought it was very worthwhile, Ms. Szabo denoted, however,
there were questions including those related to legalities,
and so on, and Mr. Mowrer brought up points that she thought
were worth following up on. Ms. Szabo stressed it was not
to try to destroy the idea but it was for the lack of information
that the members of the Committee thought was necessary.
Chairwoman Dolan assured Mr. Crownfield that the matter
is still moving forward. Ms. Dolan explained her wish was
for the Committee to co-sponsor a memorandum to Attorney Spadoni.
Ms. Dolan affirmed there was no Resolution to be acted upon.
Advising the Committee did not feel ready to move forward
for various reasons, Ms. Dolan noted that a Resolution will
be drafted by Attorney Spadoni, who had already offered to
do so. Ms. Dolan, expressing her appreciation for Mr. Crownfield’s
concerns, said she agrees with everything he said. However,
Ms. Dolan expressed that working within a Council one must
compromise, and move forward.
Shooting Incident – Police Officer
Mayor Callahan, commenting he understands that Ms. Szabo
had some concern about the absence of his earlier attendance
at the Council Meeting this evening, said he is very disappointed
since a Police Officer was shot in the line of duty this evening,
and he was in the hospital with the Officer’s family.
Ms. Szabo expressed she was sorry and she had no way of knowing
that. Mayor Callahan advised that the Officer is fine, he
was shot twice in the lower extremities, he is resting, his
family is there with him, and he will be okay. Mayor Callahan
advised there was an Officer involved in the shooting and
it was turned over to the State Police to investigate. Mayor
Callahan stated he wanted to get the word out because there
was misinformation earlier about the status of the Officer.
Mayor Callahan, noting Department Heads were aware of the
matter, and certain Council Members were aware of it, said
the Press is here, and he wanted to let everybody know that
the Officer is fine and he will recover. Mayor Callahan pointed
out that the incident highlights the very dangerous nature
of being a Police Officer even in a City as safe as Bethlehem.
He added that the Police put their lives on the line on a
daily basis for the citizens, and everyone should sleep tonight
thankful they are there.
Cost of Living; Community Policing Advisory Committee
Dana Grubb, 2420 Henderson Place, noted there has been a
great deal of concern expressed on public safety issues in
Bethlehem the past few months. Mr. Grubb, referring to a recent
Money magazine rating that Bethlehem is included in the list
of one of the top 100 places to live, remarked most already
knew the City was a great place to live, play, and work if
one could find a job that will pay what it takes to support
a family or a home that is out of one’s price range.
Mr. Grubb stated that few seem to be listening to citizens
concerns about the direction that Bethlehem is taking. Recounting
that Mayor Callahan appointed a community policing advisory
committee several months ago, Mr. Grubb noted only an initial
meeting has been held that appeared to be disorganized. Mr.
Grubb queried when the committee will begin to play a role,
provide input, and become more involved because it is important
to the quality of life in Bethlehem neighborhoods.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance - Updating
Mr. Grubb, turning to the updating of the City’s Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Ordinance, said it seems there is a “Cindarella”
process underway in that there are $160,000 slippers into
which the feet of zoning changes and the comprehensive plan
are being jammed. He thought the City is being sold a bill
of goods. Taking issue with comments made by the Mayor a number
of months ago, Mr. Grubb stated if the updates were done five
years ago perhaps the unfettered growth being witnessed today
would not be happening in such a helter-skelter way, and residents
would not be expressing their concerns at such a high level
of participation that he has not seen in close to 40 years
of attending Council Meetings. Mr. Grubb, focusing on Eighth
Avenue, asserted the desecration of the corridor is mind-boggling.
He continued on to say the City is looking at having a 17
plus story building in the downtown immediately adjacent to
two and a half story residences. Mr. Grubb said what needs
to be accomplished with the Comprehensive Plan is to get it
completed in a way that is not watered down, and there needs
to be zoning updates because the City is at risk in dealing
with 30 year old Zoning regulations. Mr. Grubb observed he
has noticed over the past three years that Council seems more
concerned with the development of a Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Ordinance update than anybody else in the City outside
of the residents. Mr. Grubb thanked the Members for their
continuing resolve and their pressure placed on the Administration
to get the project moving. He added the City should get as
much bang for its dollar as possible and the community should
not be sold short with the end product.
Timer for Speakers
Mary Pongracz, 321 West Fourth Street, stressed if she is
allowed five minutes to speak, and she is interrupted by someone
who gives an opinion, the clock should be stopped so that
she is allowed the full five minutes to speak that has been
mandated by Council. Ms. Pongracz, noting the clock continues
when Members of Council speak, asserted that detracts from
her right to speak for five minutes. Ms. Pongracz said she
would like to have an opinion on whether or not the clock
should be stopped when a person is addressing the speaker.
City Historic Preservation Boards – Meeting on Various
Issues
Ms. Pongracz, observing that President Schweder has stated
very clearly the problem with historic preservation groups,
said unfortunately many times it is not the applicant who
is the problem or the owner of the property but it is the
vendor with whom they are dealing. Ms. Pongracz advised that
the historic board is increasingly dealing with people who
are buying property in the historic area and want to bring
it up to date, and their vendor is from New York City. Ms.
Pongracz thought what needs to be done is to sit down with
Council and review several issues that have come up. Ms. Pongracz
further advised there may be someone who really wants to improve
a property and is not aware they need a permit and they are
in a historic zone. Ms. Pongracz recommended that both the
Historic and Architectural Review Board and the South Bethlehem
Historic Preservation Commission, as well as the Mt. Airy
group, sit down with Members of Council and go over some of
the problems that are being faced. Stressing that many of
the City’s worthwhile buildings have been lost, Ms.
Pongracz asserted “we don’t need to lose any more.”
President Schweder noted he has had discussions with Chris
Ussler, the City’s Historic Officer, about the matter,
and it should be talked about with more specifics.
Bethlehem Authority – Independent Authority
Stephen Antalics, 737 Ridge Street, noted an issue that
has been on his mind for several years has been the Authorities
of the City that have seemed to cost the taxpayers many dollars,
specifically the Bethlehem Authority. Mr. Antalics asked if
the Mayor feels the Bethlehem Authority should be an independent
authority and if no why, and if yes why is it not happening.
Mayor Callahan, replying no, said that does not mean his
opinion will not change but as of right now he believes it
should not be. Mayor Callahan felt the long term strategic
plan that was undertaken that reviewed sewer and water operations
went a long way to identify the problem of the blurred line
of responsibilities between the Bethlehem Authority that is
the financing authority, and the City Administration that
is charged with operating both sewer and water operations.
Under the leadership of Mr. Brong and of Richard Master, Chairman
of the Bethlehem Authority, the relationship has improved
dramatically and is operating much better than in the past.
Mayor Callahan continued on to say he is willing to allow
that to continue at this point since it is working. In further
response to Mr. Antalics, Mayor Callahan pointed out there
are positives and negatives to having an operating authority,
and the City would lose a certain amount of control over rates
if the Bethlehem Authority were an operating authority.
Mr. Antalics remarked if the Bethlehem Authority operated
like the Parking Authority or the Housing Authority it would
be an efficient system.
Gang Activity
James Follweiler, 2222 Main Street, noting his business
is located just off Broadway across the border into Fountain
Hill and he has owned the building for five years, said during
that time he has continued to see issues of graffiti, vandalism,
broken windows, and gang symbols within the past six months.
Noting in the past month there was a shooting across the street,
Mr. Follweiler advised over the weekend he found a wallet
on the roof of his building when he was fixing a water leak.
When he turned in the wallet, the Fountain Hill Police Officer
recognized the name, and the driver’s license was stolen
from the owner of a pizza shop near his building during a
robbery. Mr. Follweiler expressed the hope that the anti-gang
push is beneficial not only for the City but for all the communities
in the Lehigh Valley.
Police Officer – Shooting
Mr. Follweiler felt that a simple professional update from
the Mayor regarding his being at the hospital with the wounded
Police Officer would have sufficed as opposed to comments
directed towards a Council Member.
Ms. Dolan, communicating it is stressful to be in a hospital
situation, expressed appreciation that Mayor Callahan was
at the hospital with the Police Officer who had been shot.
Mayors Climate Change Agreement
Ms. Dolan commended Mayor Callahan for his recent signing
of the Mayors Climate Change Agreement that she said was a
very forward thinking thing to do. Continuing on to note that
Mayor Callahan took the lead, Ms. Dolan informed the assembly
that Mayor Callahan arranged the co-signing of the agreement
by Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski and Easton Mayor Phil Mitman.
Ms. Dolan commented that it sets the City further along on
a course that has been already pursued, and thanked Mayor
Callahan for his leadership.
Mayor Callahan, thanking Ms. Dolan for her kind words, advised
that both Peter Crownfield and Ms. Dolan were very instrumental
in persuading him to sign the agreement. Mayor Callahan noted
it was Ms. Dolan’s idea to conduct the signing in the
19th Street Theater in Allentown where Al Gore’s movie,
An Inconvenient Truth, was shown. Mayor Callahan stated that,
obviously, if local government is to have an impact on the
climate or environment in the Lehigh Valley, then the three
cities should take the lead. Mayor Callahan thanked Ms. Dolan
for her leadership on the issue. Focusing on the Climate Protection
Agreement, Mayor Callahan advised there are twelve points
and the City of Bethlehem is already doing ten of them. Mayor
Callahan exemplified that the City’s capturing methane
at the sewer plant and running it for an extra 90 minutes
is not only great economically, and the plant runs more efficiently
saving taxpayer dollars, but it is also good for the environment.
Mayor Callahan further exemplified that replacing the City’s
traffic signal lights with LED lights uses 10% of the energy
used by a typical light, is cost effective, and protects the
environment. Mayor Callahan informed the assembly that Allentown,
Bethlehem, and Easton became the third, fourth, and fifth
cities in Pennsylvania to sign on to the Climate Protection
Agreement.
14. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
|