Council Minutes
August 16, 2005 Meeting Minutes
BETHLEHEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Tuesday, August 16, 2005 – 7:30 PM – Town Hall
1. INVOCATION
2. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
President J. Michael Schweder called the meeting to order.
Pastor Larry Humberd of Lehigh Valley Grace Brethren Church,
offered the invocation which was followed by the pledge to
the flag. Present were Ismael Arcelay, Jean Belinski, Robert
J. Donchez, Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., Gordon B. Mowrer, Magdalena
F. Szabo, and J. Michael Schweder, 7.
PUBLIC HEARING
Intermunicipal Liquor License Transfer Request – Starter’s
Riverport
Attorney Francis O’Brien, noting that the Members
of Council will recall the prior history of this applicant
who came before City Council on a related type of issue, said
that matter is on appeal. Attorney O’Brien continued
on to say the applicant is now attempting to purchase a liquor
license that the applicant would want to move across the municipal
boundary into the City of Bethlehem, and affirmed that City
Council must approve the transfer of the liquor license before
it can be moved into the City. Attorney O’Brien explained
the applicant would be purchasing a license from outside the
City, from the source of Segatti’s Tavern, One West
Main Street, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, and the applicant is
asking tonight for City Council’s approval to have the
license come into the City to allow the applicant to serve
alcohol at the Starter’s Riverport project. Highlighting
the fact that most restaurants have alcohol as an accompaniment
to food as an amenity for their customers, Attorney O’Brien
stated that, as Mr. Rank will testify, alcohol is a very small
part of his business but a very important part. Attorney O’Brien
further stated for the type of dinner and lunch crowd that
Mr. Rank would have he would not have but for his ability
to serve alcohol. Attorney O’Brien confirmed this is
the same project and the same plans that were reviewed before
for the Public Hearing at the May 18, 2005 City Council Meeting.
Advising the booklet is not going to be handed out again,
Attorney O’Brien said that is all the same and asked
for that to be incorporated by reference into this record.
Attorney O’Brien posed questions to Mr. Rank who responded,
as follows.
David J. Rank, 5 Walking Purchase Circle, Northampton, said
he owns Starter’s Pub, currently at 3731 Route 378 in
Bethlehem. Mr. Rank advised he has been associated with the
existing Starter’s Pub for five plus years. Mr. Rank
stated he has been a resident of Northampton all his life,
51 years, and his residence for 18 years is in a new home
that he built. Mr. Rank described his plans for the former
Johnson Machine Shop. The Johnson Machine Shop is a building
that represents 4-1/2 acres, has a 180,000 square foot print,
172 condominiums are going into the project, it will have
2 courtyards, and a 400 plus car indoor parking garage. The
front of the building is going to be two entities, one will
be a fitness center on the right hand side of the building
which encompasses approximately 12,000 square feet, and Starter’s
Riverport Restaurant will be on the left hand side of the
building comprised of approximately 23,000 square feet. The
Starter’s Riverport Restaurant, a traditional restaurant
or sports bar, has two main themes which are a dining area
and a bar. Inside there will be a banquet facility that will
seat 100 people. The dining and restaurant area will seat
approximately 350 people. Besides the banquet, dining, and
bar facilities there will be a coffee shop called the Cappuccino
Factory. The intent is to feature coffee items such as Iron
Ore blend, or Welders blend that appeal to the Steel industry.
A game room will also be put inside with a lounge upstairs
so that people in the evening can enjoy dessert or non-alcoholic
beverages rather than having to go to a bar. Mr. Rank continued
on to explain that a lot of people go out to a movie at night
and want to be able to go somewhere afterwards that is not
necessarily a bar. The coffee shop that will open at 7:00
a.m. will also be incorporated to serve the restaurant. Mr.
Rank explained the menu will feature everything that is served
currently at Starter’s Pub from wings, burgers, and
steak sandwiches to expanded dinner items. Mr. Rank informed
the Members that at the current Starter’s Pub 75% of
the business is food and 25% is beverages of which approximately
80% is alcohol, that works out to about 78% to 22% taking
total food and beverage to alcoholic sales. Mr. Rank, noting
it would be higher in food and other things like banquets
and the game room in the new restaurant, calculated it may
be in the 80% plus range in non-alcohol related projects,
and added that is why he is putting in a coffee shop. Mr.
Rank affirmed that, although the present alcohol sales are
only 22%, the ability to sell alcohol to the success of the
project concept is extremely important. Mr. Rank, observing
people like to go out, noted most people would like to have
a beer and/or a glass of wine with their dinner so he has
to make sure that is offered, especially in the environment
the restaurant is in. Mr. Rank observed today it is found
that more people drink less than they did in the past, but
it is extremely critical that the restaurant has the ability
to serve liquor within the restaurant.
Mr. Donchez asked the hours of operation.
Mr. Rank responded the restaurant will open at 11:00 a.m.
and will serve food until 11:00 p.m. Mr. Rank said he plans
to open the coffee shop at 7:00 a.m., and six parking spaces
will be allocated for people to come in and get coffee in
the morning.
Public Comment
Robert Pfenning, 2830 Linden Street, advising he does not
have any questions for Mr. Rank, said he is trying to understand
how Council functions and reaches its decisions, and stated
he would like to go through what he thinks will be going through
Council’s minds as it makes its final decision. Mr.
Pfenning said he thinks Council will be probably taking into
consideration that Mr. Rank’s business is in the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, and the sale and consumption of alcohol under
certain rules and restrictions is legal in the Commonwealth.
Mr. Rank continued on to say Council probably will be considering
the fact that the license is regulated by a State body, that
in terms of alcohol sales the customers are adults 21 years
of age or older, that alcohol can be over-consumed, abused,
and can become an addiction or alcoholism. Mr. Pfenning noted
there are many things that result from the consumption of
alcohol ranging from public drunkenness to drunken driving,
family breakups, spousal abuse, suicide, missed work, lost
jobs, and social evils. Mr. Pfenning thought Council will
also probably be considering that the opening of the business
would create jobs on the South Side, and the bulk of the customers
who would consume alcohol will do so in a responsible manner,
will enjoy themselves, and will go back in the community with
no social or ill behavior.
President Schweder stated that the appropriate Resolution
will be placed on the September 6, 2005 City Council Agenda.
Attorney O’Brien asked if it is possible for City
Council to hold a vote on this issue this evening. Attorney
O’Brien said “we’ve lost additional time,
and Mr. Rank is understandably getting anxious about moving
forward because the LCB process cannot start until Council
punches our ticket…”.
President Schweder affirmed that Christopher Spadoni, City
Council Solicitor, is not in attendance this evening.
President Schweder asked John Spirk, City Solicitor, if
he sees any concern.
Attorney Spirk replied he does not.
President Schweder stated the matter will be added to the
Agenda under Resolutions this evening if that is agreeable
to the Members of Council.
The Public Hearing was adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of August 2, 2005 were approved.
5. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR (for public comment on ordinances
and resolutions to be voted on by Council this evening)
None.
6. OLD BUSINESS
Musikfest
Ms. Szabo asked for a report on how extensive was the damage
on Sunday evening as a result of games being played on Main
Street.
Dennis Reichard, Acting Mayor, advised he asked for a report
this morning at the staff meeting.
City Council Meeting – August 2, 2005 – Comments
of Northampton County District Attorney John Morganelli
Mr. Arcelay read the following statement for the record:
“It is rather unfortunate that I have to take the time
to reply to statements made at our last Council meeting. As
we sit up here we all accept criticisms and disagreements.
We even at times must accept character judgment. We are public
officials.
However, I am concerned that as I have offered to share some
concerns and come forward, the manner in which it was received
by our D.A. John Morganelli, I can only imagine what happens
when a constituent musters the courage to speak out. D.A Morganelli
has never spoken with me and hasn’t a clue to my work
ethics to imply I cavalierly make statements concerning my
Council responsibilities.
The August 2 Bethlehem City Council meeting was rather interesting.
As a City Councilman and representative of you, the people,
part of my job requires that I be an attentive listener, while
I attempt to protect the health, welfare and safety of the
people. Another part requires that I be prudent before I speak.
When constituents come to me with concerns, I am required
to separate the wheat from the chaff. When I am asked to keep
information confidential, I have a duty to honor that request,
until I can get to the bottom of that particular problem.
In the end, it is my job to act according to what I believe
is in the best interest of the City and the people who live
here. We all know how costly litigation can be, especially
if you lose. My responsibility is to create vehicles that
would minimize these situations for our City while at the
same time ensuring I cascade information.
Due to conflicting vacations and work commitment schedules,
I have finally been able to share my concerns with Commissioner
Donchez. During my term, I receive information because I have
created a bond of trust in the office that I represent. In
a representative democracy, the development of trust is very
important. How can problems be addressed if people are distrustful?
Over the course of my term, I have received complaints and
information of alleged police misuse of authority. Since this
information is sensitive, I have been circumspect in how I
have handled it. While most police officers handle their jobs
in a professional and efficient manner, no agency or company
is 100 percent efficient.
My original goal was and still is to have a vehicle where
citizens may feel comfortable to pass along complaints. I
am fully aware of the various vehicles already in place, however
over the course of my term various individuals have chosen
not use those vehicles. Does that mean those vehicles have
flaws? No, but perhaps the fact that there are various vehicles,
is because there is a need for them.
We all have been blessed with two ears and one mouth. I gather
it is because we should all spend more time listening. As
I read this I still have not received a call from the D.A.
Instead of contacting me to inquire about any possible information
that I may have, Northampton County District Attorney John
Morganelli attended the August 2 City Council meeting and
chastised me and accused me of trying spread dissention. In
his conclusion, District Attorney Morganelli concluded by
referring to me as a “lame duck.”
As District Attorney Morganelli shared his public comments,
my mind switched to two great commercials. One is the AFLAC
television commercial. The commercial shows a duck who is
trying to get the attention of a group of people who are not
paying attention. No matter how hard the duck yells “AFLAC”
the group continues to talk in total oblivion.
The City of Bethlehem is far from perfect, but it is a great
place to live. I have nowhere intimated that the Police Department
is inept or worse, corrupt. However, from some information
that has come to me, there appears to room for improvement.
I have never been cavalier in my responsibilities as a councilman.
Sometimes, I receive information that does not always whet
the palette of some folks, but nonetheless, I must report
and act on it. In my walk in life, I have learned that name-calling
is neither necessary, impressive or effective.
Shooting the messenger usually means that the messenger had
accurate information, but someone in authority did not want
to receive it. There are many reasons why this happens, but
I am not going to speculate what the motive may be here.
Instead, I want to assure the people of our City that I will
continue to serve them with dignity and honor until the end
of my term, December 31, 2005.
My home office telephone number is 610-954-8982. I will graciously
answer every single call, but please, no name-calling.”
7. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Public Works Director – Amending Article 921 –
Sewer Tapping Fee
The Clerk read a memorandum dated August 9, 2005 from Michael
Alkhal, Director of Public Works, to which was attached a
proposed Ordinance to institute a sewer tapping fee by amending
Article 921, Sanitary Sewer Regulations. The City is granted
the power to charge certain enumerated fees to property owners
who desire to or who are required to connect to the City’s
sewer system. The Municipal Planning Code (53 Pa C.S.A. §
10507-A) requires that such fees be calculated as provided
in the Pennsylvania Municipality Authorities Act (53 Pa C.S.A.
§5601 et seq.). The City calculated a total tapping fee
of $2,527 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU), which includes
a capacity fee of $1,418 and $1,109 for a collection fee.
The capacity fee is based on the current cost of capacity
related facilities including the Wastewater Treatment Plant
structures, equipment, pumping, and interceptor mains. The
collection fee is based on the current cost of collection
related facilities which includes collection mains, manholes,
and associated plant. The collected tapping fees will be used
to pay for costs associated with the operations of the water
and sewer systems including for any debt service for bonds
issued to pay for impending Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion,
Wastewater Treatment Plant upgrades, and collection system
improvements.
President Schweder referred the matter to the Public Works
Committee.
B. Business Administrator – PMRS – Amending Agreement
– Part-Time Employees
The Clerk read a memorandum dated August 11, 2005 from Dennis
W. Reichard, Business Administrator, to which was attached
a proposed Ordinance and amended Pension Plan Agreement to
clarify which City employees can be members of the City’s
PMRS pension plan. The Ordinance and agreement will prohibit
part-time employees of the City from participating in the
PMRS. City Council passed Ordinance 4329 on June 21, 2005
which addressed this issue. However, the PMRS Board requires
that the City adopt an Ordinance in its approved form and
sign a new Pension Plan Agreement to officially reflect this
change. Due to the timing of the next meeting, it was requested
that First Reading of the Ordinance be held on August 16 and
Final Reading on September 6 to enable the City to return
the Ordinance and signed agreement to PMRS prior to its September
15, 2005 meeting.
President Schweder stated that Bill No. 38 – 2005
is listed on the Agenda for First Reading.
C. Bethlehem Housing Authority – Street Vacation –
Leonard Street
The Clerk read a letter dated August 10, 2005 from Clara
A. Kendy, Executive Director of the Bethlehem Housing Authority,
requesting the vacation of Leonard Street between Woodbine
and Lebanon Streets, a 15’ to 18’ wide alley that
accesses and is integral to an existing Fairmount parking
lot. The street vacation will permit the construction of new
elderly housing units to be located closer to Leonard Street,
a better site plan for the project, preservation of trees,
and greater buffering between the surrounding private homes.
President Schweder referred the request to the Planning
Commission.
D. Assistant City Solicitor – Amendment No. 2 to Lease
Agreement – Police Substation – 723 Center Street
The Clerk read a memorandum dated August 11, 2005 from Joseph
M. Kelly, Assistant City Solicitor, to which was attached
proposed Amendment No. 2 to Lease Agreement between the City
and Fred A. Achey for use by the City of 723 Center Street
for a police substation on a month to month basis, beginning
June 1, 2005.
President Schweder stated the appropriate Resolution can
be placed on the September 6 Council Agenda, since the Public
Safety Committee does not wish to review this matter.
E. Rezoning Request – Linden Street and Oakland Road
– Request for Continuance
The Clerk read a letter dated August 12, 2005 from Attorney
Tamer S. Ahmed, representing Commerce Bank, requesting that
the rezoning request for Linden Street and Oakland Road be
continued to September 20, 2005. The Public Hearing was originally
scheduled for this evening’s August 16, 2005 City Council
Meeting.
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to reschedule the Public
Hearing on Tuesday, October 4 at 7:30 PM in Town Hall.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The motion
passed.
8 . REPORTS
A. President of Council
None.
B. Mayor
None.
C. Finance Committee
Mr. Donchez, Chairman of the Finance Committee, presented
an oral report of the Committee’s meeting held August
10, 2005, on the following subjects: Transfer of Funds –
Mechanical Maintenance – Gasoline; Amending General
Fund Budget – Historic and Traffic Studies – Creek
Road and South Mountain; Transfer of Funds – Police
Department – Overtime; Amending General Fund Budget
– Police Department – Bicycle Course; Transfer
of Funds – Engineering Bureau – Temporary Help;
Utilization of Savings – Liquid Fuels Fund – Equipment;
and Health Bureau - Grants.
9. ORDINANCES FOR FINAL PASSAGE
A. Bill No. 34 – 2005 – Amending Non-Utility
Capital Budget – Norfolk-Southern Right of Way Acquisition;
PennDot Grant – Sidewalks on Linden Street and Eighth
Avenue, and Removing Pedestrian Bridge on Eighth Avenue
The Clerk read Bill No. 34 – 2005, Amending Non-Utility
Capital Budget – Norfolk-Southern Right of Way Acquisition;
PennDot Grant – Sidewalks on Linden Street and Eighth
Avenue, and Removing Pedestrian Bridge on Eighth Avenue, on
Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
34 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4334,
was declared adopted.
B. Bill No. 35 – 2005 – Amending Article 121
– Finances – Requiring a Balanced Budget
The Clerk read Bill No. 35 – 2005, Amending Article
121 – Finances – Requiring a Balanced Budget,
on Final Reading.
Mr. Leeson, with reference to quotes reported about the
matter concerning the use of cash balance with respect to
budget forecasts, asked what is the current formula or practice.
Mr. Reichard replied that until this year in the General
Fund the Administration has used about $150,000-$200,000 of
cash balance. He added the Administration tries to use a conservative
amount. Mr. Reichard, affirming that has been done for many
years, explained that now in the Water Fund, Sewer Fund, and
Golf Course Enterprise Fund the Administration shows the excess
of revenues over expenditures, but the beginning and ending
cash is shown at the bottom of the budget revenue page along
with the total amount of the expenditures. Mr. Reichard continued
on to say that cash then is used to fill in the gap, and it
is not budgeted as a revenue source as it is in the General
Fund. This year, because of the newly instituted EMST (Emergency
Municipal Services Tax), the Administration did not use any
cash at all as it proposed the Budget to go into this coming
year. Mr. Reichard, while denoting “we don’t want
to use cash”, said “but you may have to use some.”
Mr. Reichard recalled that in the past over $1 million was
used in the General Fund to balance the General Fund Budget
when the City had $2-2.5 million of cash. Mr. Reichard, while
affirming it has always been a practice to use cash, stressed
it is a last resort.
Mr. Leeson inquired whether he heard Mr. Reichard say the
practice was changed from 2003 to 2004.
Mr. Reichard replied “we’ve always had a revenue
line item in the General Fund for cash. We used cash this
year because of EMST…going in this year…We took
that $150,000 out and just put it to the bottom line for projected
cash. We didn’t use it up as a revenue to balance the
budget. We had the tax increase, we had the EMST, so we pulled
that out. But, before that happened, when we did introduce
the Budget we had cash in there…about $150,000 maybe
$200,000.”
Mr. Leeson queried whether it was Mr. Reichard’s intention
if the Ordinance passed to change that policy about how cash
balance is used.
Mr. Reichard, responding no, explained that when he discussed
the issue with Mr. Leeson and at the Finance Committee meeting
he said obviously the Administration does not want to use
cash and wants to keep that to the side. However, if it would
need to be used, he would have to use some but conservatively
to balance after everything else is looked at, such as cutting
expenditures, revenues, and so on. Mr. Reichard further said,
if it does not match so that there is a balanced budget, then
he would have to use some cash conservatively.
Mr. Leeson, with reference to the article, expressed that
Mr. Reichard is not contemplating any changes in the way he
plugs cash into proposed budgets if the Ordinance passes.
Mr. Reichard, saying no, communicated that for years the
Administration either had the cash on the bottom line or had
it up within the revenue sources. Mr. Reichard said no there
is not going to be a change in what the Administration is
doing.
President Schweder inquired whether cash balance is a revenue
for accounting purposes.
Mr. Reichard confirmed that for budget purposes the Administration
does at times use cash. In further response to President Schweder,
Mr. Reichard said no that money is not being counted twice.
Mr. Reichard exemplified if it is estimated that the year
end cash balance would be $1,000,000 then he would take $200,000
cash to use to balance the budget and the estimate for cash
balance at the bottom of the page would state $800,000.
President Schweder, noting that is already counted in the
budget as revenue, observed the cash balance is derived from
revenue sources.
Mr. Reichard stated the cash balance is from beginning balance,
revenues minus expenditures, and ending cash. Mr. Reichard
advised when the budget is being prepared, the Administration
has to estimate going into the following year where it thinks
the cash is going to be. Mr. Reichard stated it has always
been his feeling to be conservative on using that number.
Mr. Reichard added if the number is shown on the bottom of
the revenue page it is not being used but rather the number
is just listed there.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
35 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4335,
was declared adopted.
C. Bill No. 36 – 2005 – Reimbursing Sewer Assessment
Fund
The Clerk read Bill No. 36 – 2005, Reimbursing Sewer
Assessment Fund, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
36 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4336,
was declared adopted.
10. NEW ORDINANCES
A. Bill No. 37 – 2005 – Amending General Fund
Budget – Historic and Traffic Studies – Creek
Road and South Mountain; Police Department – Bicycle
Course; and Mechanical Maintenance - Gasoline
The Clerk read Bill No. 37 – 2005, Amending General
Fund Budget – Historic and Traffic Studies – Creek
Road and South Mountain; Police Department – Bicycle
Course; and Mechanical Maintenance – Gasoline, sponsored
by Mr. Leeson and Ms. Szabo, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM,
COUNTIES OF LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON,
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AMENDING
THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR 2005.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
37 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
B. Bill No. 38 – 2005 – Amending PMRS Agreement
– Part-Time Employees
The Clerk read Bill No. 38 – 2005, Amending PMRS Agreement
– Part-Time Employees, sponsored by Mrs. Belinski and
Mr. Donchez, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE OF BETHLEHEM CITY, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH
OF PENNSYLVANIA. ELECTING TO CHANGE THE BENEFITS IT HAS IN
THE PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM UNDER ARTICLE
IV OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT LAW; AGREEING
TO BE BOUND BY ALL PROVISIONS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT LAW AS AMENDED AND AS APPLICABLE TO MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES
CHANGING BENEFITS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE; STATING
WHICH OF CERTAIN OPTIONS PERMITTED UNDER THE SAID LAW ARE
ACCEPTED BY THE CITY.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
38 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
11. RESOLUTIONS
Considering Resolutions 11 A through 11 C as a Group
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to consider Resolutions
11 A through 11 C as a group. Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs.
Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 7. The motion passed.
A. Certificate of Appropriateness – 414 High Street
Mr. Leeson and Mr. Arcelay sponsored Resolution 14,675 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a privacy
fence at 414 High Street.
B. Certificate of Appropriateness – 501 Main Street
Mr. Leeson and Mr. Arcelay sponsored Resolution 14,676 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate gutters
and sidewalk at 501 Main Street.
C. Certificate of Appropriateness – 14 West Market
Street
Mr. Leeson and Mr. Arcelay sponsored Resolution 14,677 that
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install bronze
plaques at 14 West Market Street.
Voting AYE on Resolutions 11 A through 11 C: Mr. Arcelay,
Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolutions passed.
Considering Resolutions 11 D through 11 F as a Group
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to consider Resolutions
11 D through 11 F as a group. Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs.
Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 7. The motion passed.
D. Transfer of Funds – Police Department – Overtime
Mr. Leeson and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,678 that
transferred $30,000 in the General Fund Budget from the Police
– Salaries Account to the Police – General Overtime
Account to meet overtime obligations through the end of the
year.
E. Transfer of Funds – Engineering Bureau – Temporary
Help
Mr. Leeson and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,679 that
transferred $4,000 in the General Fund Budget from the Engineering
Bureau – Salaries Account to the Engineering Bureau
– Temporary Help Account to provide funding for temporary
help.
F. Utilization of Savings – Liquid Fuels Fund –
Equipment
Mr. Leeson and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,680 to
utilize savings in the Liquid Fuels Fund Budget in the amount
of $3,175 in the Equipment Account to purchase replacements
for obsolete and worn out equipment.
Voting AYE on Resolutions 11 D through 11 F: Mr. Arcelay,
Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 7. The motion passed.
Adding Resolution 11 G
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to add Resolution 11 G
to the Agenda. Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr.
Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder,
7. The motion passed.
G. Intermunicipal Liquor License Transfer – Starter’s
Riverport
Mr. Leeson and Mr. Mowrer sponsored Resolution 14,681 that
approved the request for the intermunicipal transfer of a
Restaurant Liquor License Number R-9237, presently in the
name of Raymond Pavan t/a Segatti’s Tavern, One West
Main Street, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, to Starter’s Riverport,
Inc., 11 West Second Street, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolution
passed.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Separating Items in Bills
Ms. Szabo expressed her feeling that Council often looks
like Congress with a lot of things lumped together in one
Bill, such as Bill 34 where six items are in the Bill, and
if one has an objection to any one item it is a little touchy
about taking it out or opposing it. Ms. Szabo asked if there
could be different amendments or at least a better description
before hand of what the amendments are.
President Schweder noted that before hand everyone is asked
if there are objections to grouping Resolutions together,
for example. While expressing his understanding of Ms. Szabo’s
comments with respect to Ordinances, President Schweder pointed
out that any Member of Council, with a second, would have
the right to ask that a particular portion of a Bill be removed
and voted upon separately. President Schweder further affirmed
that each individual issue in an Ordinance could stand alone
and could be voted upon by making a motion and a second and
a vote to separate items.
Main Street - Damage
Ms. Szabo acknowledged the presence of James Smith, Superintendent
of Streets, at the City Council Meeting who she said does
an excellent job of taking care of the streets, filling the
potholes, and so on. Ms. Szabo advised there was a deep pothole
on Shaw Street next to her house that was taken care of. Ms.
Szabo, noting she saw Mr. Smith on Main Street yesterday surveying
the damage, asked if Mr. Smith could tell the Members of Council
what damage was done on Main Street.
Mr. Smith, advising that new chains were put up the week
before Musikfest, stated that from Broad Street to Walnut
Street the chains were busted off at night. Mr. Smith added
that a bollard that had just been maintained and painted to
be ready for Musikfest was broken off the stand. Mr. Smith
continued on to say a flower urn that was painted before Musikfest
was tipped over and broken. Mr. Smith informed the Members
that tomorrow if the tents are taken down he will do a walk
through and survey how many slates have been broken from the
weights of the tents that were installed on the sidewalks.
Mr. Smith commented that he could obtain an estimate of the
price of the damage.
Planning Commission Meeting - Prohibiting Gambling in the
HI, IR and IR-F Zoning Districts
Mr. Leeson said it is his understanding that at the upcoming
Planning Commission meeting there may be some presentation
from the Law Bureau based on meetings in the office of Tony
Hanna, Director of Community and Economic Development, concerning
whether there are any technical or legal issues with the proposed
zoning amendment to prohibit gambling in the HI, IR and IR-F
zoning districts. Mr. Leeson asked for the assurance of John
Spirk, City Solicitor, that he will communicate those in advance
to Christopher Spadoni, City Council Solicitor, if there are
any so that Attorney Spadoni can review them, or if anything
needs to be drafted in advance it can be drafted.
Attorney Spirk indicated his agreement.
Mr. Mowrer inquired whether there is any limitation on time
for speakers at the upcoming Planning Commission meeting.
Attorney Spirk, responding he does not believe there is any
time limitation and it is subject to the Chair trying to allocate
time so that everybody can be heard, noted he does not believe
the Planning Commission has ever adopted any formal finite
number of minutes per speaker.
Mr. Mowrer, asking that the fact be related that there are
some who feel everyone should be given the opportunity to
talk, commented that probably five minutes is more than adequate.
Tony Hanna, Director of Community and Economic Development,
recounting the chair has had this discussion before with other
issues where there is the opportunity for a lot of public
input, denoted the chair has very broad discretion in terms
of establishing it. Mr. Hanna, explaining that typically the
chair will establish ground rules ahead of time, confirmed
there is no mandated time limit.
Scheduling Public Hearing – LVIP – Zoning Map
and Text Amendments
Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski moved to schedule a Public
Hearing on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 at 7:30 PM in Town
Hall on the request from the Lehigh Valley Industrial Park
(LVIP) that was read into the record at the August 2, 2005
City Council Meeting for Zoning Map and Text Amendment changes.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The motion
passed.
Request for Meeting with the Mayor – Tom Smith
Mr. Arcelay said he received a telephone call from Tom Smith,
chair for the Northampton County Advisory Committee to the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. Mr. Arcelay, relating
that Mr. Smith has been trying to schedule a meeting with
Mayor Callahan since March, advised that Mr. Smith asked Mr.
Arcelay to politely remind the Mayor that Mr. Smith has been
trying to schedule a meeting with him and if the Mayor could
please try to meet before the end of the year. Mr. Arcelay
stated Mr. Smith’s telephone number.
13. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
Speed Bumps – Main Street
Sophia Martin, 1446 Cortland Street, advised she is a lifelong
resident of Bethlehem for 74 years. Ms. Martin informed the
assembly her complaint is about speed bumps in the 1900 block
of Main Street. Ms. Martin explained that, after Monocacy
School, a 15 miles per hour sign was put up, and there are
two speed bumps. After receiving no response to her call to
the Traffic Bureau on July 15, 2005, Ms. Martin called again
on July 19 and was told that Frank Barron, Traffic Engineer,
takes care of such matters. Ms. Martin advised she spoke with
Mr. Barron who felt the speed bumps are necessary because
neighbors complained about too much traffic and speed. Noting
the first bump is a hazard and the area it is not wide enough
for two cars to go through, Ms. Martin wanted to know how
it was decided and was told neighbors petitioned for it, and
want the country atmosphere. Ms. Martin continued on to note
the detour on Elizabeth Avenue will continue for 75 days,
and she was told by Mr. Barron that the speed bumps will be
in place until November. Ms. Martin further advised that,
at the first speed bump right after the school, barrels were
installed and only one car can go through because cars must
yield to oncoming traffic. Ms. Martin notified the Members
that she lives on a residential street and the other side
of the street is zoned Institutional for Moravian College,
there is no light, there are trucks every day, garbage trucks,
and traffic as a result of Moravian College, and everyone
cooperates the best they can. Ms. Martin, who was told by
Mr. Barron to use Center Street, questioned why she should
and described how she would have to backtrack in order to
do so. Ms. Martin advised that others at the Moravian College
Block Watch group have said they also have problems with the
situation. Ms. Martin pointed out there are only ten families
in that section of Main Street, and agreed there is more traffic
now due to the detour. Ms. Martin notified the Members that
the speed bumps are not painted and can hardly be seen. Ms.
Martin explained she feels it is dangerous. Ms. Martin, advising
she talked to Mayor Callahan on August 12 on WGPA, noted the
Mayor felt it is good to slow traffic. Ms. Martin, referring
to a newspaper article about speed bumps at Creed Road and
that people should not take short cuts, questioned why people
should not take short cuts if someone can get to their house
in a shorter distance, added she pays taxes, and further questioned
why someone should have to go out on a main road where there
is increased traffic. Ms. Martin felt that the speed bumps
should be checked out further, and if not she will have to
ask people to sign a petition just like the people on Main
Street did.
Proposed Casino in Bethlehem
Stephen Antalics, 737 Ridge Street, recalled that at the
August 2, 2005 City Council Meeting he addressed the proposal
of Mr. Mowrer and Mr. Leeson to amend the Zoning Ordinance
to prohibit gambling in the HI, IR, and IR-F Districts. Mr.
Antalics, referring to the minutes of the August 2 Council
Meeting, noted he was directed to read the transmittal communication
that accompanied the proposed Ordinance that set forth the
thinking about the proposal. Mr. Antalics, noting Mr. Leeson
was absent at the August 2 City Council Meeting and Mr. Mowrer
was present, said he did not get a response to what was meant
by full and complete public assessment. Mr. Antalics asked
if Mr. Leeson was willing to tell him what was meant when
he sponsored the draft Ordinance as far as full and complete
public assessment.
Mr. Leeson informed Mr. Antalics that he chose the vehicle
of a zoning ordinance amendment because it would involve two
bodies, the Planning Commission and City Council, and the
Administration. Mr. Leeson continued on to say it would provide
an opportunity for citizens input on multiple occasions, not
only in the meetings leading up to the Planning Commission
meeting, but also during the Planning Commission process.
Mr. Leeson noted it would also be an opportunity for the commercial
proponents of the casino slots to make their presentation
as well because they have been conspicuously absent from Town
Hall. Mr. Leeson affirmed that City Council’s zoning
amendment process takes two votes. Mr. Leeson said he is anticipating
that there will probably be good, substantial, and worthwhile
public comment from both the proponents and opponents, and
thought that was a healthy process.
Mr. Antalics queried when Council is given the recommendation
of the Planning Commission would the full and complete public
assessment be the citizens of Bethlehem.
Mr. Leeson explained the Planning Commission will conduct
their hearings, make a recommendation to advise City Council,
and City Council will have two votes to enact the Ordinance.
Mr. Leeson restated the process involves two bodies with substantial
citizen input.
Mr. Antalics wondered on whose guidance the Planning Commission
will base their decision, on consensus or their own personal
opinion.
Mr. Leeson communicated it is a combination and varies from
public official to public official, and said he thinks he
speaks for this body that they take public comment and listen
to it. Mr. Leeson pointed out that has been the tradition
of every City Council in the history of the City. Mr. Leeson,
while denoting it is not the only factor, affirmed it is a
substantial factor. Mr. Leeson, continuing on to communicate
he thinks it is a factor essential to the process, observed
there have been occasions in the past when citizens will bring
things to light of which he was unaware or that may influence
his thinking.
Mr. Antalics, focusing on the term consensus, queried whether
Mr. Leeson would place more credibility on the consensus of
the community or a given group in making a decision on the
proposed Ordinance.
Mr. Leeson informed Mr. Antalics he would be pleased to
have this one on one discussion with Mr. Antalics any time,
and he is hear to listen to Mr. Antalics tonight under the
Courtesy of the Floor.
Mr. Antalics, noting that Packard Auditorium where the Planning
Commission meeting will be held has 597 seats, said there
are 40,000 people in Bethlehem so if one talks about the consensus
of 597 people it will be highly polarized, or go to the community
which gives the community consensus. Mr. Antalics stated he
feels the issue should be referred to a referendum. Turning
to the process of initiative, Mr. Antalics stated it would
take 10% of the last number of voters for the office of Mayor
to sign a petition within 15 days in the City Clerk’s
office which would mean 2,405 people have to sign the petition
in the presence of the City Clerk. Mr. Antalics, reading from
the Third Class City Code, said he would interpret it that
if an initiative is signed by 100 people they could ask that
the Ordinance be placed on a referendum in November for a
yes or no vote. Mr. Antalics said he thinks the decision rests
with the people. Mr. Antalics stated that Council could table
the Ordinance and refer it to a referendum. Mr. Antalics,
saying he would like a legal opinion, inquired if he gets
a written request of 100 qualified electors and brings it
to City Council and asks that the Ordinance be put on the
November ballot will that hold, versus the 10% of those who
voted for the Mayor in the last election done in 15 days in
the City Clerk’s office. Mr. Antalics commented there
are two conflicting opinions, one from the referendum handbook
from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and one from the Third
Class City Code.
President Schweder indicated he would need to get back to
Mr. Antalics.
Mr. Antalics, with reference to comments of Mr. Mowrer,
did not think that any one Member of Council has the right
to question or demand the limitation on public expression
at the Planning Commission meeting.
Roger Hudak, 1256 E. Fifth Street, recalled he has been
in contact with Members of Council and with Mr. Antalics regarding
the issue of a proposed casino in Bethlehem. Mr. Hudak affirmed
that he sent a letter to the Members of Council that outlines
six items of dire importance that the proposed Ordinance would
attempt to block. Mr. Hudak, stating the amount of taxes that
Bethlehem Steel Corporation paid when it was in its heyday
amounted to approximately 15% of the City’s budget,
stressed that 15% has not been replaced and it is gone along
with the Steel Company. Mr. Hudak commented, should the Venetian
Sands resort happen, then approximately 20% of the City’s
budget can be gleaned in taxes to be paid by that property
owner, besides the $10 million in license fees. Mr. Hudak
asserted that is enough for anyone who owns property and pays
taxes in the City to say how can we not support this. Mr.
Hudak noted, although he is not a gambler, he is a member
of Concordia Lutheran Church which is a Missouri Synod Lutheran
that “is more conservative than the Roman Catholic Pope”
and there are members of his church who travel to Atlantic
City and spend a few dollars on the slot machines there and
will be happy to do the same and leave their money in Bethlehem.
Mr. Hudak continued on to say there are a goodly number of
people in his congregation who gamble more money than he would
ever take to Atlantic City on the stock market and various
funds in order make profits. Mr. Hudak added he is sure the
Moravian Church also has members who play the stocks. Mr.
Hudak related the major concern of Dr. Rokke, President of
Moravian College, was the college students of Lehigh University
and Moravian College would be betting on football and basketball
games in the Venetian slots casinos. Mr. Hudak, pointing out
anyone who has lived in South Bethlehem realizes it is a steel
town and still is a steel town, observed “you could
gamble and bet on anything you want to tonight if you know
where to go and if they let you in.” Mr. Hudak advised
that people can bet on the internet. Mr. Hudak highlighted
the fact that a partnership was formed in the Kemmerer Museum
in March 2004 when people and organizations from South and
North Bethlehem got together for a day on a Saturday and talked
about what they would like to see happen on the South Side.
Mr. Hudak informed the assembly that a lot of those groups
have withdrawn into the background because they are fearful
of admonition by those who do not like the idea of partnering
with the Venetian Sands. Mr. Hudak said “the only way
that we are going to get the heritage, the historical preservation
of the property over there is if we partner with the Venetian…they
actually own that real estate, and a lot of people forget
that. And, when they bought that real estate there was no
City Council talking about changing the zoning, and you know
their lawyers are watching that and watching every move. And,
if we’re all real lucky the Governor is going to come
back and say maybe we better just take that away from that
City Council…But the partnership has been a good one.
We’ve been meeting with all these guys.” Mr. Hudak
explained that the casino representatives are young, attentive,
and come to meetings. Mr. Hudak advised that a representative
of Michael Perrucci was at every block watch and South Side
Task Force meeting to answer questions. Turning to the crime
issue, Mr. Hudak said living on the South Side he can affirm
that “Interstate 78 has brought more rif-raf and crime
into the City of Bethlehem than the Las Vegas Sands Venetian
casino ever will.” Mr. Hudak stressed that most importantly
for his neighborhood is jobs, with 2,000 to 5,000 jobs related
to the operation. Mr. Hudak expressed that is besides the
heritage, the people who can be hired for the museum, the
extra buildings that might be needed, and the parking for
Northampton County Community College. Mr. Hudak asserted one
must think very carefully of all of the ramifications of everything
that is done.
Dean Bruch, 625 Hawthorne Road, expressed his understanding
that it was heart-wrenching to see the loss of Bethlehem Steel
Corporation. Mr. Bruch expressed his opinion that the Steelworkers
did not seem interested to have something happen there, and
did not want to contribute to see this happen. Mr. Bruch pointed
out that in four years there was a museum in Pittsburgh. Mr.
Bruch observed although some say that gambling is supposed
to be its salvation he does not know. Mr. Bruch wondered what
would happen after it does not work. Mr. Bruch, noting that
he has attended a few Planning Commission meetings, said if
someone does not live near where something is going on they
are not notified. Mr. Bruch felt that the Planning Commission
listens to the clientele that have asked for the plans. Mr.
Bruch, cautioning that Council should beware of a Planning
Commission recommendation, said “it’s not the
way to go. You go to the way of the people…They voted
for you and you owe them what you’re supposed to do
by your vote that you got elected to do.”
Other Issues
Mr. Bruch inquired about the issue of Medicare reimbursements
that was reported in the newspaper. Mr. Bruch asked if the
City received any money from the Broad and Guetter Street
grant. Mr. Bruch advised that his comments at the last City
Council Meeting about the garages and the problem of parking
was not about the Walnut Street Garage but the North Street
garage to be built two levels higher, and why the City is
allowing developments without adequate parking.
Liquor Licenses
Dana Grubb, 2420 Henderson Place, congratulated Starter’s
Riverport, and added with all the projected development he
hopes at some point officials will start looking at the number
of liquor licenses in the City.
City Website
Mr. Grubb thanked the City Clerk’s office for resolving
several issues to ensure the timely posting of agendas, minutes,
and meeting schedules on the City’s website. Mr. Grubb
commented that the City’s website has suffered a number
of breakdowns in terms of providing the public with timely
and relevant information concerning the actions of City Council.
City Vehicles - Gasoline Costs
Mr. Grubb recalled that he addressed City Council in the
past on the matter of escalating fuel costs and highlighted
the fact that the cost per gallon hit $2.50 a gallon as he
had predicted, and stressed the costs will get higher. Mr.
Grubb appealed to City Council and the Administration to review
and act on the matter. Mr. Grubb recounted that at a recent
Finance Committee meeting the Director of Parks and Public
Property indicated that usage of City vehicles in 2005 was
in line with 2004, and the increase in fuel costs were the
primary reason for higher City fuel charges. Mr. Grubb challenged
the Administration “to walk the talk of doing more with
less.” Mr. Grubb felt that too many City employees are
commuting back and forth to work at the taxpayers expense.
Mr. Grubb stated that the Administration should eliminate
unnecessary driving, and said City officials should not be
using City vehicles to deliver their recycling materials to
the Recycling Center or to pick up their children from school.
Mr. Grubb added that getting to work is an obligation and
responsibility of the employees and not the taxpayers.
Crime in Bethlehem
William Scheirer, 1890 Eaton Avenue, referred to two newspaper
reports today, one concerning a fight that occurred at the
McDonald’s Restaurant on the South Side last Sunday
and discharge of a gun, and another concerning the discharge
of a weapon eight times into the house at 1036 Linden Street
last Monday while the owner was sleeping. The owner thought
the incident might have involved disgruntled tenants who were
evicted from another property he owns. Mr. Scheirer observed
that two years ago when he returned to Bethlehem incidents
seemed to involve 85% knives and 15% guns versus 60% knives
and 40% guns now. Mr. Scheirer, while commenting that the
homicide rate has not gone up, felt it is just a matter of
time before it does, unless something is done. Mr. Scheirer
asserted the signs are that violence here is increasing, particularly
in the use of firearms. Mr. Scheirer said at budget time a
serious look should be taken at hiring more than one additional
Police Officer. Stating he passed a note to the Police Commissioner,
Mr. Scheirer asked how many additional Police Officers above
and beyond replacements could be meaningfully incorporated
into the Police force in one year.
Francis Donchez, Police Commissioner, replied it is a difficult
question to answer because it is dependent upon what kind
of policing and service the citizens decide and would be willing
to pay for. Police Commissioner Donchez, affirming there are
146 Police Officers, explained the Department could probably
get by with 100 Officers if there were two basic services
of patrol to answer 911 calls, and of investigation to follow
up on crime. There would be no Officers in the schools or
in the neighborhoods. Querying “could…I find meaningful
duties for 200 Officers? Absolutely. We’d have 3 Officers
in every neighborhood.” Police Commissioner Donchez
affirmed he could find meaningful tasks for 10 more Police
Officers for vice, investigations, and patrol. Police Commissioner
Donchez, advising that statistics show the majority of crime
occurs where the highest concentration of 14 to 25 year old
males live, explained that is probably in the areas that have
the most rental properties. Police Commissioner Donchez, recalling
that as he had said to Mr. Arcelay during a public meeting
several months ago, pointed out the Police Department does
a lot of things for the citizens that other cities do not
do, such as funeral escorts, and investigation of non-reportable
accidents. Police Commissioner Donchez affirmed that such
benefits do come at a cost.
Mr. Scheirer asked if the Department could accommodate 20
more Officers if they were devoted to patrol and community
policing, for example. Police Commissioner Donchez responded
absolutely. Mr. Scheirer calculated that one mill could bring
in about 24 additional Police Officers. Mr. Scheirer, noting
that budget review is not too far away, said it is “not
too soon to start thinking about what we want to do to keep
Bethlehem safe.”
Liquor License Transfer Approval – Starter’s
Riverport
David Rank thanked City Council for allowing him to get
the liquor license transfer request approved this evening
for Starter’s Riverport, and added he knows Council
went out of their way to do so. Mr. Rank expressed his appreciation
for Council’s actions. Mr. Rank requested a sealed copy
to send tomorrow. Mr. Rank, again thanking Council for their
time tonight, said he is happy to be part of the City of Bethlehem.
Various Issues
Eddie Rodriquez, 436 Pawnee Street, stressed “you’ve
got to be out there seeing what I see.” Mr. Rodriquez
advised he gave to Police Commissioner Donchez a piece of
paper pertaining to certain things happening in the City that
he has seen, and added he will “continue to do it, day
in and day out…”. Mr. Rodriquez, inquiring about
settled and pending lawsuits, said he is mentioning these
things because the aggressive or sarcastic nature that has
been “put on certain residents including myself, Eddie
Rodriquez…”. Mr. Rodriquez said he is afraid this
is something that will take the City to another lawsuit. Mr.
Rodriquez, pointing out that it is not all Police Officers,
said “one bad apple spoils the whole bunch.” Mr.
Rodriquez remarked it is also happening with certain Department
Heads and employees in the City. Mr. Rodriquez, stressing
he is getting dirty on his hands and knees working in the
City, said he is “just about sick and tired of having
to receive somebody’s raw deal on the other side…I’m
asking you to stop it right now…because for the simple
fact that I deserve a lot more respect.” Mr. Rodriquez,
saying he will bring this up again and again to Council, stated
he wants it dealt with. While noting he continuously commends
certain Department Heads, supervisors and employees, Mr. Rodriquez
highlighted the fact they have been a tremendous help, but
said others have made comments such as you are harassing me,
and do not call here. Mr. Rodriquez further communicated he
does not want Tom Marshall, Recycling Director, talking to
him disrespectfully about something when the Recycling Director
was not there. Mr. Rodriquez stated all he is asking of someone
who may receive a call from him notifying them of any incident
is to simply accept the call, take down the information, and
notify the proper departments so they in turn can deal with
whatever issues he is calling about, not to yell, or tell
him there is nothing that can be done, or to disrespect him,
or to get sarcastic. Mr. Rodriquez stressed that today’s
incident at the Recycling Center was uncalled for. Mr. Rodriquez,
explaining that today at the Recycling Center he saw children
leaning over a recycling container and did not see any City
employees watching what he saw before him, notified the assembly
then he has reason to be concerned about injuries and a potentially
hazardous condition. Mr. Rodriquez related that he also observed
children running across the recycling roadway as cars were
coming in and out of the Recycling Center and backing out.
Mr. Rodriquez, focusing on the Greenway, asked will there
be a fence line at Daly Avenue eastbound, left side, from
Hayes to just below the Fourth Street bridge.
Mr. Rodriquez, saying he cannot imagine moving Weldship,
Inc. by the Hill to Hill Bridge in the area near St. Luke’s
offices and Perkins Restaurant, wondered whether people fail
to see the potential danger of an explosion.
Mr. Rodriquez inquired about the status of the houses eastbound
on Daly Avenue on the cliff where the ground has and continues
to eroded. Mr. Rodriquez wondered whether one particular tree
be eventually be removed that will cause further erosion on
the cliff and roadway where cars are parked.
Mr. Rodriquez, referring to Mr. Mowrer’s comments,
did not agree with a 5 minute speaking limit at the upcoming
Planning Commission meeting.
Mr. Rodriquez said put foot patrols back on the streets
by two, and enforce the Ordinances.
Proposed Casino in Bethlehem
Santiago Rivera, 1349 Lynn Avenue, said 5 years ago he moved
to Hellertown, soon afterwards discovered the South Side of
Bethlehem, and purchased property in the 800 block of East
Fourth Street about 4 years ago. Mr. Rivera, continuing on
to say he became unemployed 3-1/2 years ago, advised at that
time he came across the Community Action Development Corporation
(CADC) when he was fixing up his East Fourth Street property
that had been vacated. Mr. Rivera and his wife joined the
CADC’s start your business class, and about 3 years
ago started their business called Magic Woman Personalized
Services that offers cleaning of residential and commercial
properties, lawn care, and property management. Two years
ago he purchased an additional investment property on the
North Side near the Moravian Village. Ten months ago he purchased
the former McIlvain Fire House on Lynn Avenue and located
his business there. Mr. Rivera further advised that five months
ago he added his first employee in addition to him and his
wife, and next month will add two more employees who will
be relocating from New York City to Bethlehem. Three months
ago he received a loan from Rising Tide to help make improvements
to the building. At the end of the month Mr. Rivera hoped
to close on an additional investment property on the South
Side. Mr. Rivera pointed out that with each property he has
increased his tax bill to the City, hopes to encourage his
employees to spend their dollars in Bethlehem, and noted his
employees will add to Bethlehem’s tax roles. Mr. Rivera
stressed that he and his wife have been able to do this “with
no slot machines located within any of our buildings or any
of our properties, with no lotto requirements, simply with
some wise dollars that were spent three years ago and before
to establish self-help government type intervention, start
your business class, Rising Tide loans, and other dollars
that were spent. My opinion is that economic development is
coming to Bethlehem, it’s already happening. I chose
to be involved in South Side Bethlehem before I knew of any
gambling…”. Mr. Rivera stressed that if someone
like him and his wife are able to make this happen then he
is pretty sure that companies that have a lot bigger budgets
can certainly make it happen. Mr. Rivera said he would like
to see the direction go, instead of looking at slots as economic
development, if the funding is available as the Bethlehem
Works develops out, towards trying to create more opportunities
for residents of Bethlehem by encouraging them rather than
go to work for someone else to work for themselves. Mr. Rivera
thought that is the better way to go for economic development
for the City and the people of the City.
14. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
| 
