Council Minutes
February 15, 2005 Meeting Minutes
1. INVOCATION
2. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
President J. Michael Schweder called the meeting to order.
Reverend Ruth Santana-Grace of First Presbyterian Church offered
the invocation which was followed by the pledge to the flag.
Present were Ismael Arcelay, Jean Belinski, Robert J. Donchez,
Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., Gordon B. Mowrer, Magdalena F. Szabo,
and J. Michael Schweder, 7.
Citation – Honoring Francis Supanek
President Schweder advised that the Citation honoring Francis
Supanek who retired from the Fire Department after 26 years
of service will be forwarded to him since he was unable to
be present this evening.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of February 1, 2005 were approved.
5. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR (for public comment on ordinances
and resolutions to be voted on by Council this evening)
Rail Line – South Bethlehem
Bradford Pease, 2029 East Columbia Street, Allentown, advised
he is representing Rail Options for the Valley, and Delaware
Valley Association of Rail Passengers with over 1,000 members
most of whom ride trains daily to work. Mr. Pease, turning
to the City’s acquisition of the Norfolk Southern rail
line right-of-way in South Bethlehem, asked that language
be inserted in the agreement to guarantee that the right-of-way
will be preserved for possible future use for rail transportation.
Mr. Pease, focusing on the Lynn Street Bridge replacement,
asked that the bridge be designed to accommodate the two track
right-of-way between Bethlehem and Philadelphia. Mr. Pease
highlighted the fact that, although this is only a short stretch
of track, it is part of the national inner-city rail network
system, and is the only link between the Lehigh Valley and
Philadelphia. Mr. Pease stressed it is critically important
that this right-of-way not be lost forever.
Mr. Pease noted that many changes have been made in the rail
system in Philadelphia since the ending of rail service about
20 years ago. In the past, the system ended at the Reading
Terminal on Market Street in Philadelphia. With the new city
rail tunnel, the trains not only stop on Market Street but
travel also to the Philadelphia Airport and to 30th Street
Station where passengers can take high speed trains to Washington,
Florida, New Orleans, and the West Coast. Mr. Pease reiterated
this is a critical link in the system.
Mr. Pease remarked it seems inevitable that rail service
will be restored sooner or later in view of worsening traffic
congestion, long traffic delays on various highways, and apparently
no new highways being planned to alleviate congestion. He
mentioned that, at one time, Route 33 was supposed to extend
from the Lehigh Valley to Philadelphia but is now a dead issue
because properties are not available to purchase right-of-ways,
and a bypass in Quakertown seems out of the question because
of the tremendous cost to purchase right-of-ways. Mr. Pease
pointed out that studies have been completed and plans are
being made to extend rail service that presently goes from
Philadelphia to Lansdale into Quakertown and then to the Lehigh
County line below Coopersburg from which point it is only
13 miles to Union Station in Bethlehem.
Mr. Pease, commenting that plans need to be made for the
future, stated that the right-of-way through Bethlehem and
South should be preserved.
6. OLD BUSINESS
None
7. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Rezoning 53 East Lehigh Street – Postponement of
Public Hearing
The Clerk read a letter dated February 9, 2005 from Michael
J. Perrucci on behalf of Woodmont Properties of Parsippany,
New Jersey and Peron Construction, LLC of Bethlehem, requesting
that the February 15, 2005 Public Hearing on the rezoning
request of 53 East Lehigh Street be postponed and rescheduled.
President Schweder stated that a Public Hearing will be
rescheduled when additional information is received.
B. City Solicitor –Records Destruction – Department
of Community and Economic Development
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 8, 2005 from
John F. Spirk, Jr., City Solicitor, to which was attached
a proposed resolution to destroy records from the Department
of Community and Economic Development according to the previously
adopted Municipal Records Retention Act, provided that the
Department comply with the retention requirements promulgated
by the appropriate administering, funding or licensing agency
which in this case is the Housing and Urban Development Department.
President Schweder stated that the appropriate Resolution
will be placed on the March 1, 2005 City Council Agenda.
C. City Solicitor – Use Permit Agreement for Public
Property - American Association of University Women, Bethlehem
Branch – Book Fair
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 8, 2005 from
John F. Spirk, Jr., City Solicitor, to which was attached
a proposed resolution for a Use Permit Agreement between the
American Association of University Women, Bethlehem Branch,
for use of the Memorial Pool Building for the 2005 Book Fair
for the time period March 14, 2005 to April 25, 2005, according
to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
President Schweder stated that the authorizing Resolution
will be listed on the March 1, 2005 City Council Agenda.
D. City Solicitor – Use Permit Agreements for Public
Property – ArtsQuest – Musikfest 2005-2007
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 8, 2005 from
John F. Spirk, Jr., City Solicitor, to which was attached
proposed resolutions for Use Permit Agreements between ArtsQuest
and the City of Bethlehem for use of various City properties,
and use of various City streets, for Musikfest 2005, 2006
and 2007, for the time periods listed and according to the
terms and conditions of the Agreements.
President Schweder stated that the authorizing Resolutions
will be listed on the March 1, 2005 City Council Agenda.
E. Director of Planning and Zoning – Norfolk Southern
Railroad Right of Way Acquisition – TEA-21 Grant
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 8, 2005 from Darlene
Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, to which was attached
a resolution to authorize the execution of a Federal Aid Reimbursement
Agreement to approve the acceptance of the TEA-21 funding
award of a $200,000 grant through PennDOT for the acquisition
of the Norfolk Southern Railroad Right of Way in South Bethlehem.
President Schweder stated that the appropriate Resolution
will be placed on the March 1, 2004 City Council Agenda, unless
the Parks and Public Property Committee wishes to review this
matter.
F. Director of Planning and Zoning – Proposed SALDO
Revisions – Traffic Impact Study and Recreation Fee
Provisions
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 11, 2005 from Darlene
Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, concerning discussion
at the February 1, 2005 Public Hearing on the revisions to
the Subdivision and Development Ordinance. It was proposed
that Section 1347.14(b)(2) be revised to add the following
sentence: “No traffic study and/or land development
or subdivision plan reviews will be processed until the escrow
is fully funded.” It was further requested that action
be taken on the proposed Recreation Fee revision in the Subdivision
and Development Ordinance, and that the commercial/industrial
fee revision can be handled as a separate matter in the near
future.
President Schweder stated that the amendment can be considered
on Final Reading of the Ordinance at the March 1 City Council
Meeting.
G. Director of Planning and Zoning – Petition to Vacate
a Portion of Silk Mill Street
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 11, 2005 from
Darlene Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, stating that
the Planning Commission, at their meeting of February 10,
2005, voted to recommend approval of the request to vacate
a portion of Silk Mill Street with the condition that the
legal description and easement agreement be provided by the
petitioner for review.
President Schweder stated that the appropriate Ordinance
will be considered when required easement agreements have
been finalized.
H. Director of Public Works – Supplemental Federal
Aid Reimbursement Agreement – PennDOT – Lynn Avenue
Bridge Replacement Project
The Clerk read a memorandum dated February 11, 2005 from
Michael Alkhal, Director of Public Works, requesting a resolution
authorizing the execution of Supplemental Federal Aid Bridge
Project Agreement No. 050008-A for the Lynn Avenue Bridge
Replacement. The City will be reimbursed 95% of these costs
and the maximum reimbursement will be increased from $87,400
to $213,750.
President Schweder stated that Resolution 11 G is listed
on the Agenda.
8 . REPORTS
A. President of Council
None.
B. Mayor
None.
C. Public Works Committee
Mr. Mowrer, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, presented
an oral report of the Committee’s meeting that was held
February 8, 2005, on the following subject: Strategic Plan.
9. ORDINANCES FOR FINAL PASSAGE
A. Bill No. 1 – 2005 – Amending Article 347 –
Municipal Claims for Delinquent Accounts
The Clerk read Bill No. 1 – 2005, Amending Article 347
– Municipal Claims for Delinquent Accounts, on Final
Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson,
Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No. 1 –
2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4303, was declared
adopted.
B. Bill No. 2 – 2005 – Amending Article 925 –
Stormwater Management Ordinance
The Clerk read Bill No. 2 – 2005 – Amending
Article 925 – Stormwater Management Ordinance, on Final
Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
2 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4304, was
declared adopted.
C. Bill No. 3 – 2005 - Amending 9-1-1 Fund Budget –
2004 Audit Invoice
The Clerk read Bill No. 3 – 2005 – Amending
9-1-1- Fund Budget – 2004 Audit Invoice, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
3 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4305, was
declared adopted.
D. Bill No. 4 – 2005 – Amending Non-Utility Capital
Budget – Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus
The Clerk read Bill No. 4 – 2005 – Amending
Non-Utility Capital Budget – Self-Contained Breathing
Apparatus, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
4 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance 4306, was
declared adopted.
E. Bill No. 5 – 2005 – Establishing Salary –
Mayor
The Clerk read Bill No. 5 – 2005 – Establishing
Salary – Mayor, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, and Ms. Szabo, 6. Voting NAY: Mr. Schweder,
1. Bill No. 5 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance
4307, was declared adopted.
F. Bill No. 6 – 2005 – Establishing Salary –
Controller
The Clerk read Bill No. 6 – 2005 – Establishing
Salary – Controller, on Final Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, and Mr. Schweder, 6. Voting NAY: Ms. Szabo,
1. Bill No. 6 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance
4308, was declared adopted.
G. Bill No. 7 – 2005 – Establishing Salary –
President and Members of Council
The Clerk read Bill No. 7 – 2005 – Establishing
Salary – President and Members of Council, on Final
Reading.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, and Mr.
Mowrer, 4. Voting NAY: Mrs. Belinski, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder,
3. Bill No. 7 – 2005, hereafter to be known as Ordinance
4309, was declared adopted.
10. NEW ORDINANCES
A. Bill No. 8 – 2005 – Amending Article 1302
– Definitions
The Clerk read Bill No. 8 – 2005, Amending Article
1302 – Definitions, sponsored by Mr. Donchez and Mrs.
Belinski, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1302 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS
AMENDED, ENTITLED DEFINITIONS.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
8 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
B. Bill No. 9 – 2005 – Amending Article 1312
– CL District – Use Regulations
The Clerk read Bill No. 9 – 2005, Amending Article
1312 – CL District – Use Regulations, sponsored
by Mr. Donchez and Mr. Leeson, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1312 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS
AMENDED, ENTITLED C-L LIMITED
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
9 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
C. Bill No. 10 – 2005 – Amending Article 1316
– LI District – Use Regulations
The Clerk read Bill No. 10 – 2005, Amending Article
1316 – LI District – Use Regulations, sponsored
by Mr. Donchez and Mr. Leeson, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1316 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS
AMENDED, ENTITLED L-I LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
10 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
D. Bill No. 11 – 2005 – Amending Article 1319
– Off-Street Parking and Loading
The Clerk read Bill No. 11 – 2005 – Amending
Article 1319 – Off-Street Parking and Loading, sponsored
by Mr. Donchez and Mr. Leeson, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1319 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS
AMENDED, ENTITLED OFF-STREET
PARKING AND LOADING.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
11 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
E. Bill No. 12 – 2005 – Amending Article 1322
– Uses Granted Under Special Conditions
The Clerk read Bill No. 12 – 2005 – Amending
Article 1322 – Uses Granted Under Special Conditions,
sponsored by Mr. Donchez and Mr. Leeson, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1322 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS
AMENDED, ENTITLED USES GRANTED
UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
12 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
F. Bill No. 13 – 2005 – Amending Zoning Ordinance
– Appendix A-2, A-3 and A-4 – Table of Area, Yard,
and Building Regulations
The Clerk read Bill No. 13 – 2005 – Amending
Zoning Ordinance – Appendix A-2, A-3 and A-4 –
Table of Area, Yard, and Building Regulations, sponsored by
Mr. Donchez and Mr. Leeson, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE APPENDIX
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS AMENDED,
ENTITLED TABLE OF AREA, YARD AND BUILDING
REGULATIONS.
President Schweder inquired about the practical aspects
of the proposed changes to delete the two and a half stories
in the CG District but keeping a designated height.
Darlene Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained
there have been some appeals before the Zoning Hearing Board
where applicants were able to meet the maximum height requirement
but the developments were at least three stories, and the
appeals were granted. Ms. Heller continued on to advise there
appears to be no negative impact of allowing the additional
story if the maximum height requirement is being met. Ms.
Heller, continuing on to say the current provision seems redundant,
added that in a commercial zone the maximum height is the
factor.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No.
13 – 2005 was declared passed on First Reading.
G. Bill No. 14 – 2005 – Amending Article 1347
– Recreation Fees and Traffic Impact Studies
The Clerk read Bill No. 14 – 2005 – Amending
Article 1347 – Recreation Fees and Traffic Impact Studies,
sponsored by Mr. Donchez and Mrs. Belinski, and titled:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 1347 OF THE
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA, AS AMENDED,
BY AMENDING SECTION 1347.10 ENTITLED DEDICATION
OF PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS AND ADDING A NEW
SECTION 1347.14 ENTITLED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES.
Mr. Leeson, with reference to Ms. Heller’s February
11, 2005 memorandum, commented that, although he understands
the attempt to address proposed additional language under
Section 1347.14 (b) (2), it cannot be done that way under
the law. Mr. Leeson recommended that the following additional
sentence be added in Section 1347.14 (b) (2): “No traffic
study and/or land development or subdivision plan reviews
will be deemed administratively complete and processed until
the escrow is fully funded.”
Mr. Leeson stressed that the real key to the Ordinance is
the commercial and industrial development as far as recreation
fees. While acknowledging Ms. Heller noted in her memorandum
the fees for commercial development could be handled as a
separate matter in the near future, Mr. Leeson restated that
is the key to the program long term. As a result, Mr. Leeson
asked that the matter be added under Old Business at the next
City Council Meeting so the Members of Council can obtain
a follow-up report.
Amendment to Bill No. 14 – 2005
Mr. Leeson and Mr. Donchez moved the following Amendment:
That the following sentence be added in Section 1347.14 (b)
(2): No traffic study and/or land development or subdivision
plan reviews will be deemed administratively complete and
processed until the escrow is fully funded.
Mr. Leeson stated that the Amendment accomplishes what is
set forth in Ms. Heller’s memorandum and adds some technical
wording to meet the requirements of Pennsylvania law.
Voting AYE on the Amendment: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski,
Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder,
7. The Amendment passed.
President Schweder recalling that, at the February 1, 2005
Public Hearing, there was also discussion about limiting the
availability of traffic consultants if they had done work
for the developer, expressed his understanding there would
be language drafted to that effect. In addition, President
Schweder expressed he was under the impression that the addition
of fees for commercial development would be included with
final passage of the Bill.
Ms. Heller, turning to fees for commercial development,
indicated she was not of the understanding that should be
added to the Ordinance language for Final Reading. Focusing
on the issue of traffic consultants, Ms. Heller explained
the City has a contract with a consulting traffic engineer,
and affirmed there are not provisions in place to obtain from
the developer the costs of having a consulting engineer review
plans. However, Ms. Heller stated the City would continue
to work with that same traffic consultant unless there is
a conflict of interest.
President Schweder, highlighting the fact that the matter
has been discussed for at least three years, stressed that
everything possible should be done to remove any possibility
of conflict of interest within the language of the law. President
Schweder, affirming that he will not hold the Ordinance on
First Reading, suggested that language be drafted that expressly
states the matter, and consideration be given to amending
the Ordinance on Final Reading.
Voting AYE on Bill No. 14 – 2005, as Amended: Mr.
Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer,
Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. Bill No. 14 - 2005 was declared
passed on First Reading.
11. RESOLUTIONS
A. Requesting Police Training Grant – Municipal Police
Officers’ Education and Training Commission –
POLEX Training Course
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,565 which
authorized obtaining reimbursement of monies for expenses
incurred in connection with the Police Department’s
POLEX Training Course scheduled for June 2005, pursuant to
the training provisions of the Municipal Police Officers’
Education and Training Act, and agreeing that while receiving
any funds from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania pursuant to
the Act, the City of Bethlehem shall adhere to the rules,
regulations and training standards established by the Municipal
Police Officers’ Education and Training Commission (MPOETC).
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolution
passed.
B. Requesting Police Training Grant – Municipal Police
Officers’ Education and Training Commission –
ADVANCED POLEX Training Course
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,566 which
authorized obtaining reimbursement of monies for expenses
incurred in connection with the Police Department’s
ADVANCED POLEX Training Course scheduled for October 2005,
pursuant to the training provisions of the Municipal Police
Officers’ Education and Training Act, and agreeing that
while receiving any funds from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
pursuant to the Act, the City of Bethlehem shall adhere to
the rules, regulations and training standards established
by the Municipal Police Officers’ Education and Training
Commission (MPOETC).
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolution
passed.
Considering Resolutions 11 C through 11 F as a Group
Mrs. Belinski and Mr. Donchez moved to consider Resolutions
11 C through 11 F as a group.
Voting AYE on the motion: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr.
Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder,
7. The motion passed.
C. Certificate of Appropriateness – 217 Broadway
Ms. Szabo and Mr. Mowrer sponsored Resolution 14,567 which
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to modify previously
approved work at 217 Broadway.
D. Certificate of Appropriateness – 128-136 Graham
Place
Ms. Szabo and Mr. Mowrer sponsored Resolution 14,568 which
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct an addition
at 128-136 Graham Place.
E. Certificate of Appropriateness – 521 East Fourth
Street
Ms. Szabo and Mr. Mowrer sponsored Resolution 14,569 which
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a double
sided projecting sign at 521 East Fourth Street.
F. Certificate of Appropriateness – 415 North New Street
Ms. Szabo and Mr. Mowrer sponsored Resolution 14,570 which
granted a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a window
at 415 North New Street.
Voting AYE on Resolutions 11 C through 11 F: Mr. Arcelay,
Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr. Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo,
and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolutions passed.
G. Authorizing Execution of Supplemental Federal Aid Bridge
Project Agreement – PennDOT – Lynn Avenue Bridge
Mr. Donchez and Ms. Szabo sponsored Resolution 14,571 which
authorized the execution of Supplemental Federal Aid Bridge
Project Agreement No. 050008-A between the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, acting through PennDOT, and the City of Bethlehem
for the Lynn Avenue Bridge over the Norfolk Southern/PB&NE
Railroad, in accordance with the Agreement.
Voting AYE: Mr. Arcelay, Mrs. Belinski, Mr. Donchez, Mr.
Leeson, Mr. Mowrer, Ms. Szabo, and Mr. Schweder, 7. The Resolution
passed.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Federal Budget – CDBG (Community Development Block
Grant) Program
Mr. Donchez, highlighting the fact that in President Bush’s
State of the Union speech it was noted that the Federal Budget
called for the elimination of Community Development Block
Grant funds, wondered if the City has spoken with Senator
Charles Dent concerning the matter.
Mayor Callahan, stating that clearly Community Development
Block Grant dollars have been the lifeblood of a lot of communities,
pointed out that the City of Bethlehem does an excellent job
of utilizing CDBG dollars for a lot of important projects
in low and moderate income areas of the City. Mayor Callahan
advised there have been discussions with both Senators and
the Congressman, and the City will be making its voice heard
through the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities
and the U. S. Conference of Mayors. Mayor Callahan observed
what the end result will be is hard to say, and added that
the budget will go through a lot of changes. Mayor Callahan
stressed that the City is concerned and alarmed by the potential
loss of CDBG funds.
Van Bittner Hall – City Government Use
President Schweder recalled that, at the February 1, 2005
City Council Meeting, he asked for a response from Tony Hanna,
Director of Community and Economic Development, with respect
to past discussions between the City and the United Steelworkers
about possible uses of Van Bittner Hall at 53 East Lehigh
Street. President Schweder noted that a response has not yet
been received.
Mayor Callahan stated that he will follow-up with Mr. Hanna
on the matter.
13. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
Recreation Commission
Anna Stofko, 1954 Greenleaf Street, noted she is president
of the Bethlehem Recreation Commission. Ms. Stofko advised
she comes before City Council tonight to inform the Members
that she will no longer seek reappointment to the Recreation
Commission. Ms. Stofko, acknowledging that she does so with
a heavy heart because she loves serving, communicated she
hopes that Council was proud of her service, and she thinks
“it’s time to go.” Recounting she was first
appointed by Council President Dolores Caskey in 1980, Ms.
Stofko continued on to recall she was reappointed by Council
President Paul Calvo, by Council President Jack Lawrence,
by Council President James Delgrosso, by Council President
Michael Loupos, by Council President Robert Donchez, by Council
President James Gregory, and by Council President J. Michael
Schweder. Ms. Stofko, thanking City Council for giving her
the privilege to go, commented that after 25 years on the
Recreation Commission she thinks it is time to go and add
“new blood.”
President Schweder thanked Ms. Stofko for her many years
of dedicated service, and expressed Council’s appreciation
to her.
Police Department - BethWorks
William Scheirer, 1890 Eaton Avenue, commented that the
present quarters of the Police Department are cramped. As
the number of Police Officers increases to cover the new activity
at BethWorks, with or without gambling, Mr. Scheirer felt
their quarters will become even more cramped. He stated that
Van Bittner Hall may or may not be suitable as a police station,
and it occupies a choice residential site. However, Mr. Scheirer
said BethWorks itself may be available. Mr. Scheirer advised
that eight days ago at the presentation by the developer,
Michael Perrucci, at the Cathedral Church of the Nativity,
he asked whether, in view of the Police Department's needs,
and in return for the rezoning Mr. Perrucci has requested
for the Van Bittner property, Mr. Perrucci would be willing
to donate land in BethWorks for a new Police Department headquarters,
the building but not the land to be paid for by the City.
Mr. Perrucci replied that he was a minority partner on the
Van Bittner project, but that if the Police needed space he
would work with them. Mr. Scheirer felt it is a golden opportunity
to solve the problem of space for the Police and also to permanently
solve the problem of parking at City Hall. He continued on
to say that the City of Bethlehem could have a state-of-the-art
Police Station worthy of the City it is becoming. While acknowledging
it would require borrowing for the construction, Mr. Scheirer
remarked that, on a scale of one to four stars, this would
be a four star bond issue. Mr. Scheirer asserted the time
to act is now, while the plans for BethWorks are still fluid.
Mr. Scheirer, adding it does not have to be BethWorks or Van
Bittner Hall, said it should be one or the other.
President Schweder noted that he and Mr. Donchez had a discussion
with respect to the matter. Observing it could be the two
locations mentioned by Mr. Scheirer, President Schweder stated
that land at LVIP should be considered as well.
Gambling – South Side Bethlehem
Jane Gauffner, 517 Carlton Avenue, stated she is at the
meeting because of the proposal to put gambling on the South
Side. Ms. Gauffner felt if there is gambling on the South
Side “you’re going to ruin the City. You’re
not going to have the City you’re looking for.”
She expressed that the City is going in a good direction right
now, as well as with employment opportunities that have come
into the City. Stressing that the huge former Bethlehem Steel
Corporation property on the South Side should be used to benefit
people, Ms. Gauffner asserted that gambling only brings problems
to any community. Ms. Gauffner said she knows personally how
it feels when somebody one cares about is involved in gambling,
years go by, money is lost, and there is nothing but heartbreak.
Ms. Gauffner felt that City officials are asking the families
of Bethlehem to endure this, and are fostering an addiction
if gambling is promoted in Bethlehem. Continuing on to say
the people with whom she is sitting remember that South Side
Bethlehem was known previously as “sin city”,
Ms. Gauffner stated it does not need to go in that direction
again. Ms. Gauffner remarked that gambling on the South Side
would be a disaster. Ms. Gauffner appealed to City Council
to stop this from happening in any way they can, and to find
productive, wealth-producing means of using the land on the
South Side.
David Kelly, 634 Elm Street, commented that he approves
of casinos on the South Side because he feels at this time
there are not a lot of jobs in the Lehigh Valley area. Consequently,
Mr. Kelly stated that a lot of people would have jobs at the
casinos, and the taxes from the gambling community will help
benefit the community of Bethlehem. Mr. Kelly communicated
that he thinks it is a good investment for the casinos to
locate at the former Bethlehem Steel area.
Police Department
Santiago Rivera, 1349 Lynn Avenue, noting that the City
of Bethlehem owns a five acre lot on Lynn Avenue that is undeveloped,
wondered whether that location would be worth considering
for a Police Station since it would be closer to one of the
main entrances to BethWorks.
Greenway – South Bethlehem
Mr. Rivera asked if the proposed greenway through South
Bethlehem only goes to the Lynn Avenue Bridge or if it proceeds
beyond that to Saucon Park.
Darlene Heller, Director of Planning and Zoning, advised
that phase one is proposed to go to the Lynn Avenue Bridge,
and phase two would go from the Lynn Avenue Bridge to Saucon
Park. She further informed Mr. Rivera it would go to the rail
yards.
Mr. Rivera, expressing his belief that there is rail service
as far as Quakertown, observed he does not know what the feasibility
is to extend that and whether the route would come to Bethlehem.
Enumerating that in view of the greenway terminating there,
the BethWorks development, and a tourist destination, Mr.
Rivera commented that the idea of having rail service from
Bethlehem to Philadelphia and the Philadelphia International
Airport is worth considering and would be a real positive.
Mr. Leeson, focusing on the right-of-way acquisition of
the Norfolk Southern Rail Line in South Bethlehem, questioned
whether phase one and two is a new concept.
Ms. Heller, commenting the terms have been used for a while,
recalled that the original grant proposal was to go to Daly
Avenue, and the Department wants to amend the request to go
to Lynn Avenue. However, the wording of the original grant
request is still being used because it ties to the grant.
Mr. Leeson, with reference to discussions about the issue
at the Parks and Public Property Committee meeting of July
14, 2004, recalled the consensus seemed to be that this was
an excellent project, and it would be ideal not to end the
greenway at Daly Avenue or Lynn Avenue. Mr. Leeson, further
recalling it was said that was not the intent, denoted he
had stated that if it is not done all at once there is a risk
factor that it may never be extended. Mr. Leeson, communicating
he would not want to see the concept of phase two at some
point in the future, said that, rather, phase two should be
with phase one. Mr. Leeson, commenting he thinks the greenway
through South Bethlehem needs to be done as a package deal,
pointed out it would be very unique to connect the greenway
to Saucon Park. Mr. Leeson continued on to say the risk factor
he sees is that, if the City does not act now, someone could
scoop the City on the land from the railroad and it could
be very difficult to get the land at a later date. Mr. Leeson
stated he would not want the nomenclature of phase one and
phase two used to have different timelines for the two segments
of land.
Ms. Szabo asked whether Norfolk Southern Railroad Company
is still intending to remove all the rails.
Ms. Heller, replying yes, advised the company started to
do that.
William Hubbard, 27 West Washington Avenue, questioned whether
the City’s acquisition of the Norfolk Southern rail
line goes all the way from EK milepost 56.7 to EK milepost
53, a distance of 3.7 miles, in other words all the railroad
right-of-way from the end of the line at Union Station to
where SEPTA owns the property up to 800 feet south of the
High Street Bridge.
Ms. Heller, advising that long term that is the City’s
goal, said right now the language in the lease takes the right
of way to Daly Avenue, and the City wants to extend that to
Lynn Avenue. In further response to Mr. Hubbard, Ms. Heller
stated the grant is for acquisition of the right-of-way, and
the Resolution is on the Agenda this evening. Continuing on
to inform Mr. Hubbard that the grant is not for the full length,
Ms. Heller advised it goes from Union Station to Daly Avenue
that is about one mile in length.
Mr. Hubbard asked what provisions are there to assure that
the right of way does not get cut. Continuing on to highlight
the fact that in the past one could not get train service
through Philadelphia and riders had to change stations, Mr.
Hubbard pointed out that now with the Philadelphia Center
City tunnel one can go directly to Washington, D.C., to Atlantic
City, New Jersey, or the Philadelphia International Airport.
Mr. Hubbard stressed that has more potential than most people
realize.
Ms. Heller, noting the terminus has always been at Union
Station, added that it will remain in public hands, and stated
it will be turned into a linear park.
Mr. Hubbard, explaining it is not Union Station that concerns
him, stressed it is the park from wherever the City ends it
to where SEPTA owns it. Mr. Hubbard advised that, as long
as it is all owned in the public sector, he feels reasonably
comfortable. But, Mr. Hubbard stressed, the chance that gets
cut could be very serious for the future.
Ms. Heller informed Mr. Hubbard that the City is still negotiating
for that portion of the right-of-way.
Mr. Leeson asked if it is correct that the lease has not
yet been brought to City Council for consideration.
Ms. Heller affirmed that the lease has not been brought
back to City Council.
Mr. Leeson, reiterating that he had mentioned the greenway
should be extended all the way to Saucon Park, stressed he
does not want the ball dropped on this. Mr. Leeson, asking
that the lease not be brought back to City Council incomplete,
requested that the right of way be obtained all the way to
Saucon Park. Recalling that several years ago, Norfolk Southern
Railroad was open to that idea, Mr. Leeson asserted “don’t
lose that opportunity.”
President Schweder observed, based on past discussions,
there is a real concern that it is not evident exactly what
the City will receive through all of the negotiations. President
Schweder communicated that the Department needs to come back
to City Council with the specifics of the matter.
Bond Issues
Dean Bruch, 625 Hawthorne Road, noting he read Mayor Callahan’s
state of the City address, thought it was very nice, well
articulated, and to the point, and added that he agrees with
the Mayor. Saying he does not like the $1.7 million loss,
Mr. Bruch commented he did not see that in the Mayor’s
statements. Mr. Bruch communicated that in the future he would
appreciate if everyone takes the bonds very sternly and do
it right. Remarking he does not want to hear again that the
City is losing money, Mr. Bruch stressed “we can’t
afford this.”
Rail Line and Conveyance of Visitors
Mr. Bruch, informing the assembly that he used to ride the
rail system to Philadelphia, highlighted the fact that now
the tracks are gone. Mr. Bruch recounted his thought about
bringing people into Bethlehem on a conveyance along the right-of-way
instead of visitors having to drive and park here. Expressing
that he likes the idea of bringing the rail back, Mr.
Bruch observed that the former train station known as Union
Station is no longer available because it is being utilized
by St. Luke’s Hospital. Mr. Bruch communicated that
by having the station out of town and having a conveyance
come into Bethlehem it would alleviate the problem of cars
and where to park them. Mr. Bruch stressed it is an idea to
consider.
14. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:33 p.m.
|